2023
DOI: 10.2341/22-042-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiopacity of Posterior Restorative Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Abstract: SUMMARY Background The objective was to investigate the radiopacity of 11 commercial posterior restorative materials by establishing their mean gray values (MGVs) and comparing them with dental hard tissues. Methods and Materials Five-disc specimens were prepared for each of the following materials: Cerasmart 270 CAD/CAM block A3LT (CS), Amalgam (A), Ketac Molar A3 (KM), Cention-N A2 (CN), G-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary response variables relating to the characterization of Cention N included FS and elastic modulus ( n =10), 11 degree of conversion ( n =3), 12 KHN ratio ( n =5), 13 water sorption and solubility ( n =10), 14 microleakage ( n =10), 11 and radiopacity ( n =5). 15 Randomization was achieved using a random number generator (Research Randomizer 4.0; Geoffrey C. Urbaniak and Scott Plous). A blinded operator performed all the physical and chemical tests conducted to analyze the chosen variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary response variables relating to the characterization of Cention N included FS and elastic modulus ( n =10), 11 degree of conversion ( n =3), 12 KHN ratio ( n =5), 13 water sorption and solubility ( n =10), 14 microleakage ( n =10), 11 and radiopacity ( n =5). 15 Randomization was achieved using a random number generator (Research Randomizer 4.0; Geoffrey C. Urbaniak and Scott Plous). A blinded operator performed all the physical and chemical tests conducted to analyze the chosen variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%