2018
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1407462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiosensitization of ultrasmall GNP–PEG–cRGDfK in ALTS1C1 exposed to therapeutic protons and kilovoltage and megavoltage photons

Abstract: Ultrasmall GNP-PEG-cRGD can be considered as a radiosensitizer. For radiotherapy applications, the delivery method should be developed to increase the GNP uptake in the tumor and decrease the uptakes in undesirable organs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The AF was also calculated in this study, which is an illustration of the enhance proportion of dead cells in cultures with and without AuNPs that have been exposed to proton irradiation. The AF value reported by Li et al was approximately 30% at 2 Gy using 10 nm AuNPs is relativelyclose to the AF at 2 Gy of 27.1% for 50 nm AuNPs in our study, while Enferadi et al report and AF at 2 Gy of 17.7% ( 37 , 42 ). Enferadi et al calculated their highest AF value of 70.4% at 6 Gy, while the AF value in our study was also highest at 6 Gy in our study, but only 43.8% ( 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AF was also calculated in this study, which is an illustration of the enhance proportion of dead cells in cultures with and without AuNPs that have been exposed to proton irradiation. The AF value reported by Li et al was approximately 30% at 2 Gy using 10 nm AuNPs is relativelyclose to the AF at 2 Gy of 27.1% for 50 nm AuNPs in our study, while Enferadi et al report and AF at 2 Gy of 17.7% ( 37 , 42 ). Enferadi et al calculated their highest AF value of 70.4% at 6 Gy, while the AF value in our study was also highest at 6 Gy in our study, but only 43.8% ( 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The AF value reported by Li et al was approximately 30% at 2 Gy using 10 nm AuNPs is relativelyclose to the AF at 2 Gy of 27.1% for 50 nm AuNPs in our study, while Enferadi et al report and AF at 2 Gy of 17.7% ( 37 , 42 ). Enferadi et al calculated their highest AF value of 70.4% at 6 Gy, while the AF value in our study was also highest at 6 Gy in our study, but only 43.8% ( 42 ). However, it is important to note that the differences in cell lines, incubation times and AuNP size, will result in cell uptake variations as well as observed radio-enhancement effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It corresponds to a more than 130% increase in the absorbed dose, and the fraction of spectra with such an effect was about 18% of the studied set. The results obtained are in good agreement with previous works [ 25 , 43 , 44 ], where a greater GNPs radiosensitization was observed at lower X-ray tube voltages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The same group evidenced that the SER decreases from 1.57 to 1.17 by increasing the energy beam from 105 kVp to 6 MV X-rays, respectively. Enferadi et al [16] reached the same conclusion by studying ALTS1C1 cells containing 1.8 nm GNPs exposed to various X-rays energy. The importance of surface functionalization was shown by Ma et al [21] who exposed GNPs coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), folic acid or TAT peptide to 6 MV X-rays.…”
Section: Cancer Cellmentioning
confidence: 59%