2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03846-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes in patients with stage I anal carcinoma found an increased 5-year OS in patients treated with chemoRT compared with RT alone (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26; P,.00001) but no significant difference in 5-year DSF (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.11; P5.87. 127 Conversely, a population-based cohort analysis of Medicare-eligible (.65 years of age or with an eligible disability) patients with stage I anal cancer showed no difference in OS, cause-specific survival, colostomy-free survival, or DFS with chemoRT versus RT alone after adjustment using propensity score methods. 128 Therefore, this study concludes that RT alone may allow for adequate oncologic outcomes for highly select patients with stage I anal cancer, although it is important to note that this study did not differentiate between anal canal and perianal cancers.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes in patients with stage I anal carcinoma found an increased 5-year OS in patients treated with chemoRT compared with RT alone (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26; P,.00001) but no significant difference in 5-year DSF (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.11; P5.87. 127 Conversely, a population-based cohort analysis of Medicare-eligible (.65 years of age or with an eligible disability) patients with stage I anal cancer showed no difference in OS, cause-specific survival, colostomy-free survival, or DFS with chemoRT versus RT alone after adjustment using propensity score methods. 128 Therefore, this study concludes that RT alone may allow for adequate oncologic outcomes for highly select patients with stage I anal cancer, although it is important to note that this study did not differentiate between anal canal and perianal cancers.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Talwar et al performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RT to CRT for stage I SCCA patients [ 5 ]. The authors included five retrospective studies with 3784 patients treated with CRT and 415 patients treated with RT.…”
Section: Chemoradiation Versus Radiation Therapy Alonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the incidence of SCCA is increasing, particularly in the elderly, with an almost 5% increase in mortality due to this malignancy in the most vulnerable [ 2 ]. While the current standard of care treatment for localized SCCA is radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent multiagent chemotherapy, questions remain if this potentially toxic and morbid treatment is appropriate for those with early-stage disease (e.g., T1–2 N0) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. In other HPV-related malignancies, such as head and neck cancer, there has been a recent emphasis placed on careful de-escalation of therapy to potentially mitigate against acute and late treatment-related toxicity while not adversely impacting patient outcomes [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In either case the administration of concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (ranging from 31% to 52%). Of note, a meta-analysis of retrospective studies confirmed a worse OS with RT alone, but it found no difference in terms of DFS [41]. Another potential approach to these early stage tumours could be local excision.…”
Section: Recent Studies On Localised Anal Squamous Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%