Complete (R0) surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality for thymoma in both early and advanced stage disease. Following trends seen in surgery for other malignancies, minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) utilizing VATS or robotic approaches have increased in popularity due to the short term and cosmetic benefits associated with minimally invasive surgery. However, the efficacy of MIT for thymoma compared to open surgery (which utilizes a median sternotomy or thoracotomy) based on oncologic results or survival outcomes remains controversial. The theoretical risk of incomplete resection or capsular disruption causing recurrence and decreased survival with MIT has led many surgeons to avoid MIT for the treatment of thymoma. Because of the relative rarity of the diagnosis and the indolent course of thymoma, comparisons of surgical technique have relied mainly on small single-center retrospective reports which provide limited levels of evidence to support any specific treatment paradigm. Historically, MIT was performed using the transcervical approach popularized as a method for treating myasthenia gravis (MG), not thymoma, although one series does report their experience with the technique for thymic tumors (1). The relative difficulty of transcervical thymectomy compared to VATS or robotic approaches has resulted in the much wider adoption of VATS/Robotic MIT as the preferred minimally invasive approach. Other questions regarding thymoma management such as which staging system to use, how to utilize the World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification, what induction or adjuvant therapies are indicated and for which stage of disease, and whether partial thymectomy, debulking surgery, or re-operative surgery are beneficial remain unanswered. These issues and the different treatment strategies employed per patient and per institution are important confounding factors whenever one analyzes any particular surgical technique.Open Surgical resection has been the gold standard of treatment for thymoma because the overwhelming majority of thymomas are localized at the time of diagnosis and amenable to local therapy. A comprehensive review of the literature that complied studies that included at least 100 patients revealed that 40% of thymomas presented as stage I, 25% as stage II, 25% stage III, 10% stage IVa, and 1-2% stage IVb (2). Thus 65% of patients presented with disease confined to the thymus gland without invasion into adjacent structures. In that review, the ability to perform an R0 resection for early stage disease was nearly 100% for stage I, with 85% for stage II (range, 43-100%). The average rate of R0 resection rate diminished significantly with advanced stage, only 47% for stage III and 26% for stage IV. In stage III and IV disease, the rate of complete resection varied widely between studies reflecting the heterogeneity of advanced stage thymomas in terms of the degree and location of invasion and the differences in institutional practice patterns concerning aggressiveness of resecti...