2008
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy augments the immune response to prostate cancer in a time‐dependent manner

Abstract: Background-Cancer immunotherapy refers to an array of strategies intended to treat progressive tumors by augmenting a patient's anti-tumor immune response. As immunotherapy is eventually incorporated into oncology treatment paradigms, it is important to understand how these therapies interact with established cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or Radiotherapy (RT). To address this, we utilized a well-established, autochthonous murine model of prostate cancer to test whether RT could augment (or diminish) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the translation of radiation doses and fractionation schemes used in humans to mice is difficult and not very well studied (8,18), prior work has shown that multi-fraction RT is more effective than single-fraction RT when combined with CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade in syngeneic tumor models (19). Additionally, we used a previously described timing approach of the immunomodulatory agent and initiated αPD-1 treatment 6 hours after the second fraction of 8.5 Gy ( Figure 1A) (20). After RT and continuous αPD-1 treatment, we measured the tumor growth kinetics every 2 weeks using noninvasive MRI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the translation of radiation doses and fractionation schemes used in humans to mice is difficult and not very well studied (8,18), prior work has shown that multi-fraction RT is more effective than single-fraction RT when combined with CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade in syngeneic tumor models (19). Additionally, we used a previously described timing approach of the immunomodulatory agent and initiated αPD-1 treatment 6 hours after the second fraction of 8.5 Gy ( Figure 1A) (20). After RT and continuous αPD-1 treatment, we measured the tumor growth kinetics every 2 weeks using noninvasive MRI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Indeed, both treatments could induce DNA double-strand breaks that, in turn, produce mutations and neo-antigens generation, promote immunological danger signals 32 and reduce tumor infiltrating immunosuppressive cell populations, such as inhibitory myeloid cells. [23][24][25][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] All these events are necessary to trigger antigen-specific CTLs (CD3 C CD8 C ), able to recognize and destroy tumor cells presenting altered and/or overexpressed molecular structures recognized as tumor-associated antigens. 41,42 On these bases, several studies in PC patients have investigated, with contrasting results, the prognostic role of the basal inflammatory status and lymphocytes density in the primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, they might have utility when used in combination with radiotherapeutic treatments (10,11). Indeed, some of the effects of ionizing radiation are now recognized as contributing to antitumor immunity (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%