2004
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy-induced salivary dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, post-radiation lesions were presumed to be associated with salivary gland damage and the resultant hyposalivation; thus, the saliva glands, the parotid gland in particular, are considered in any radiation-sparing treatment using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without the cytoprotectant amifostine [16,19,27,28]. Despite the salivary gland protection techniques, most patients remain susceptible to post-radiation dentition breakdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, post-radiation lesions were presumed to be associated with salivary gland damage and the resultant hyposalivation; thus, the saliva glands, the parotid gland in particular, are considered in any radiation-sparing treatment using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without the cytoprotectant amifostine [16,19,27,28]. Despite the salivary gland protection techniques, most patients remain susceptible to post-radiation dentition breakdown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salivary gland secretions maintain homeostasis of the upper gastrointestinal and oral cavity by generating a barrier to microbial, chemical, and mechanical insults (21,40,43). This primary function of saliva depends on numerous secretory proteins as well as the ion composition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While xerostomia is the most severe and most common side effect of RT, amifostine remains the only Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32 (5) potent drug for preventing toxicity during longterm follow up. [27][28][29][30] Nonetheless, parotid sparing intensity modulated RT, which is reported to be superior to conventional RT and amifostine, resulted in a remarkable decrease in xerostomia. 31 The present study assessed the acute and late side effects of RT within weeks to months in patients who did and did not receive amifostine during conventional RT, and the results revealed a significant decrease in the development of xerostomia and fibrosis during the late follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%