1987
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(87)90359-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resolution of flow-related symptoms such as tinnitus or headache forms the basis of outcome assessment. [11][12][13] This methodology, however, is imperfect because the presence or absence of flow-related symptoms does not necessarily correlate with the risk of hemorrhage imposed by the malformation. 1,14,15 A useful method of assessing the efficacy of radiosurgical treatment should include both an evaluation of the anatomy of the nidus as documented by angiography and clinical follow-up to identify the rate of neurological deficits resulting from either radiation effects or intracranial hemorrhage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Resolution of flow-related symptoms such as tinnitus or headache forms the basis of outcome assessment. [11][12][13] This methodology, however, is imperfect because the presence or absence of flow-related symptoms does not necessarily correlate with the risk of hemorrhage imposed by the malformation. 1,14,15 A useful method of assessing the efficacy of radiosurgical treatment should include both an evaluation of the anatomy of the nidus as documented by angiography and clinical follow-up to identify the rate of neurological deficits resulting from either radiation effects or intracranial hemorrhage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are other reports on the use o f radiosurgery [10,11] and of fractionated irradia tion alone [12][13][14], or in combination with intravascular embolization [15] to C C F , achieving the beginning o f an improvement as early as 15 days after irradia tion, and an 83.3% closure rate between 1 month and 4 years. The relative safety and efficacy of this technique makes it the treatment o f choice for low-flow C C F , while intravascular embolization maintains its indications for the high-flow ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%