Radius Bone Strength in Bending, Compression, and Falling and Its Correlation With Clinical Densitometry at Multiple Sites

Abstract

This study comprehensively analyzes the ability of site-specific and nonsite-specific clinical densitometric techniques for predicting mechanical strength of the distal radius in different loading configurations. DXA of the distal forearm, spine, femur, and total body and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measurements of the distal radius (4, 20, and 33%) were obtained in situ (with soft tissues) in 129 cadavers, aged 80.16 ؎ 9.8 years. Spinal QCT and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) were performed ex situ in degassed specimens. The left radius was tested in three-point bending and axial compression, and the right forearm was tested in a fall configuration, respectively. Correlation coefficients with radius DXA were r ‫؍‬ 0.89, 0.84, and 0.70 for failure in three-point bending, axial compression, and the fall simulation, respectively. The correlation with pQCT (r ‫؍‬ 0.75 for multiple regression models with the fall) was not significantly higher than for DXA. Nonsite-specific measurements and calcaneal QUS displayed significantly (p < 0.01) lower correlation coefficients, and QUS did only contribute to the prediction of axial failure stress but not of failure load. We conclude that a combination of pQCT parameters involves only marginal improvement in predicting mechanical strength of the distal radius, nonsite-specific measurements are less accurate for this purpose, and QUS adds only little independent information to site-specific bone mass. Therefore, the noninvasive diagnosis of loss of strength at the distal radius should rely on site-specific measurements with DXA or pQCT and may be the earliest chance to detect individuals at risk of osteoporotic fracture. (J Bone Miner Res 2002;17: 1629 -1638)

Micro–MR Imaging–based Computational Biomechanics Demonstrates Reduction in Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength after Renal Transplantation

“…During the same period, spine BMD decreased, while hip BMD did not. In accordance, a number of prior studies confirmed that BV/TV is not altered on the basis of trans-iliac histomorphometry, and spine BMD decreases only slightly during the first (58). Third, the assumed tissue modulus (15 GPa) and Poisson ratio of 0.3 may not reflect the true values for individual subjects because these physical parameters can be dependent on the subject and anatomic site (36).…”

Trabecular Bone Mechanical Properties in Patients with Fragility Fractures

“…In order to asses this load-to-strength ratio, the activity or event associated with a fracture must be identified, and the applied load and bone strength for that event estimated. The ability of a bone to resist fracture at a given loading configuration depends not only on its mass but also on the spatial distribution of bone tissue and the intrinsic properties of bone material [2,10,35,51]. A recent study showed that the ratio of skeletal loading to bone strength indices, as assessed by QCT, explains the age-and sexspecific patterns of wrist and hip fractures better than does BMD [57].…”

Potential of in vivo MRI‐based nonlinear finite‐element analysis for the assessment of trabecular bone post‐yield properties

“…However, the strength of long bones under axial compression has been shown to be predictive of failure stresses most typically occurring during a fall. 55 Finally, although it has been reported 31 that microdamage accounts for TB post-yield behavior as well, its effects were not explicitly considered in the proposed model since there is currently no imaging modality that can provide resolutions adequate to detect microdamage such as microcracks. Nevertheless, the yield and post-yield behavior predicted and which had previously been observed experimentally, are likely a manifestation of such microdamage.…”