Radon interventions around the globe: A systematic review

Abstract

Background Radon is the primary source of environmental radiation exposure posing a significant human health risk in cold countries. In Canada, most provinces have revised building codes by 2017, requiring construction solutions to avoid radon in all new buildings. While various construction solutions and remediation techniques have been proposed and evaluated, the question about the best method that would effectively reduce radon in a variety of contexts remained unanswered. Radon practitioners, officials of radon control programs, and businesses offering radon testing and mitigation services, builders, property managers, homeowners and residents also have similar queries. Objective This paper systematically reviewed both experimental and observational studies (S) with radon interventions (I) used globally in residential houses (P) compared to other residential or model houses (C) to evaluate relative mitigation effectiveness (O) that could guide selecting the best radon reduction strategy for residential buildings. Methods Two researchers searched fifteen academic bibliographic and grey literature databases for radon intervention studies conducted around the world, with particular emphasis on areas of North America and Europe published from 1990 to 2018. Interventions in residential and model houses were included, but studies piloted purely in the lab were excluded; the PRISMA checklist was used to synthesize data; Cochrane and Hamilton tools were used to evaluate study quality. Results Studies around the globe have investigated a variety of construction solutions, radon mitigation and remediation systems with different levels of effectiveness. In most cases, sub-slab or sump depressurization system (SSDS) with active ventilation technique was found more effective in achieving a significant and sustained radon reduction than the passive methods such as sealing, membrane, block and beam, simple ventilation, or filtration. The choice of an optimal strategy largely depends on the factors related to the initial radon level, routes of entry, building design and age, as well as other geologic, atmospheric, and climatic conditions. Conclusion Although an active SSDS is the best mitigation systems, at places, it needs to be combined with another system and installed by a trained radon professional considering the pertinent factors to ensure radon level continues to remain below the action level. This study did not conduct any economic evaluation of the mitigation measures. Future review with studies on the implementation of new building codes will provide updated evidence. Recommendation For the practical implementation of radon mitigation, training of the construction industry, information provision for residents, the establishment of public funds, incorporation of radon-prone areas in the land utilization maps, and enacting building codes deemed ...

Radon Knowledge and Practices Among Family Physicians in a High Radon State

“…However, high residential radon levels often can be lowered via less costly (albeit less effective) interventions that restrict the entry of radon gas into the home, for example, via sealing cracks in the floor and gaskets that cover sump pumps. 19 Economic assistance in radon remediation may be available in some areas via Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs) and other federal programs. 20 Because mobile homes typically are 1 foot or more above the ground, the average radon levels in mobile homes is low.…”

Radon Survey in Bank Buildings of Campania Region According to the Italian Transposition of Euratom 59/2013

“…The method of choice for mitigation depends on the required reduction factor and the type of floor [32,33]. In general, the best way in which to lower radon levels is to reduce the pressure difference that draws radon into a building [32] but structural interventions are not quick to apply and their feasibility depending by several factors including construction characteristics.…”

1. Experimental Research of Mitigation Systems for Controlling and Reducing Radon Exposure in Residential Buildings

“…Coskeran, Denman [13] developed a study that demonstrates that, for low radon level, installing a radon proof membrane may be cost-effective in addressing the dangers to health [13]. In many cases, this method is applied with other remedial technique, as a secondary method [14,15].…”

“…An experimental study on ventilation system in suburban buildings is presented by Merzkirch, Maas [16]. The system overall revealed strong interdependancies among all measured pollutants leading to a highly improved air features and a good comfort [15][16][17].…”

“…The results of these measurements will lay the foundantions of the first guide of good practice [4]. Both beneficiaries and investors will be able to take into account the design of future new constructions, similarly as the improvement of living conditions in existing homes [15]. The main objective of this guide is to reduce the chance of developing lung cancer by establishing medium and long term applicability measures.…”