1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radon tracing of groundwater input into Par Pond, Savannah River Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5) it seems reasonable to assume steady state (i.e., dC la /dt=0). Then the radon balance can be written (compare Corbett et al, 1997):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5) it seems reasonable to assume steady state (i.e., dC la /dt=0). Then the radon balance can be written (compare Corbett et al, 1997):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A way to reduce the uncertainty of the effect of gas exchange would be to monitor the temporal evolution of the radon concentration in the epilimnion and the radon inventory in the entire lake over an extended period of time, as demonstrated by Corbett et al (1997). Seasonal changes in the vertical stratification of the lake should lead to a dynamic evolution of the radon concentrations that can be interpreted in terms of gas exchange, vertical mixing, and groundwater input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, radon's unique chemical properties and its natural presence in subsurface fluids make it an excellent tracer of hydrologic processes. Radon has been effectively used as a tracer of water infiltration and recharge rates (Hamada and Komoe 1998;Snow and Spaulding 1997;Bertin and Bourg 1994), monitoring water body mixing , tracing stream flow paths (Corbett et al 1997) and most recently for monitoring the remediation of subsurface nonaqueous phase liquid contamination . In most of these field applications, logistics or transportation issues, not adequate sample availability, limits sample size.…”
Section: The Effect Of Sample Cocktail and Head Space Volume When Anmentioning
confidence: 99%