2014
DOI: 10.2172/1323552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RADTRAN 6 Technical Manual

Abstract: This Technical Manual contains descriptions of the calculation models and mathematical and numerical methods used in the RADTRAN 6 computer code for transportation risk and consequence assessment. The RADTRAN 6 code combines user-supplied input data with values from an internal library of physical and radiological data to calculate the expected radiological consequences and risks associated with the transportation of radioactive material. Radiological consequences and risks are estimated with numerical models … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations ( 14) to ( 16) are the equations in use today in important plume and dosimetry software models developed for radiological response. The FRMAC (Beal et al 2020), RESRAD family of codes (Yu et al 2001), and RADTRAN (Weiner et al 2014), for instance, use eqns ( 14) and ( 15) with revised coefficients. Marshall et al (2018) applied a relative weighting method favoring the long-term data in determining the goodness-of-fit for the Anspaugh models that "reaffirm their deficiencies in the short-lived timeframe wherein the dynamics of particulate dispersion dominate the resuspension process."…”
Section: Use Of Resuspension Equations In Plume and Dosimetry Softwar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations ( 14) to ( 16) are the equations in use today in important plume and dosimetry software models developed for radiological response. The FRMAC (Beal et al 2020), RESRAD family of codes (Yu et al 2001), and RADTRAN (Weiner et al 2014), for instance, use eqns ( 14) and ( 15) with revised coefficients. Marshall et al (2018) applied a relative weighting method favoring the long-term data in determining the goodness-of-fit for the Anspaugh models that "reaffirm their deficiencies in the short-lived timeframe wherein the dynamics of particulate dispersion dominate the resuspension process."…”
Section: Use Of Resuspension Equations In Plume and Dosimetry Softwar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this scenario had both safety implications during the derailment and security implications during the subsequent attack, a multi-simulator DET was constructed to model the scenario. RADTRAN 24 was used to model the safety elements (Phase 1) and STAGE 25 modeled the security elements (Phase 2).…”
Section: State-of-the-art Det 2s Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small differences in the general PDFs for radionuclides (except receptor S 3 ) can be ascribed to the comparable dose coefficients for intake among actinides (i.e., 1.1 × 10 −7 to 2.5 × 10 −7 Sv/Bq for ingestion and 2.1 × 10 −5 to 4.7 × 10 −5 Sv/Bq for inhalation) and the dominance of internal exposure for the respective receptors. In addition, irregularities of the general PDFs among the actinides observed for receptor S 3 (i.e., scrap transfer worker) result from the fact that direct radiation becomes the only applicable exposure pathway due to the general assumption of negligible portions of releasable radionuclides under normal transfer conditions [33]. On the other hand, the higher values of general PDFs for receptor M 4 (i.e., slag worker) than other receptors, can be attributed to the longer exposure time, higher external dose conversion factor due to larger dimensions of objects, shorter distance from the receptor, and the higher slag-partitioning factor of actinides, as shown in Table 2 [19].…”
Section: General Pathway Dose Factors For Processing Of Dismantled St...mentioning
confidence: 99%