2012
DOI: 10.5399/osu/jtrf.49.3.2596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rail Competition Changes Since the Staggers Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Winston and Grimm (2000), the net annual benefits to shippers were more than $12 billion in 1999 dollars in the first decade following passage of the Staggers Act. Shippers have benefited from 20 years of declining rail rates (inflation adjusted revenue per ton-mile) as well as the preservation of rural area lines sold or leased to short line railroads (Prater 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Winston and Grimm (2000), the net annual benefits to shippers were more than $12 billion in 1999 dollars in the first decade following passage of the Staggers Act. Shippers have benefited from 20 years of declining rail rates (inflation adjusted revenue per ton-mile) as well as the preservation of rural area lines sold or leased to short line railroads (Prater 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data are inconclusive on whether North Dakota and Montana wheat rail rates are higher than other states. In the 1988-2007 period, Prater et al (2010) found that in the case of revenue per ton, Montana and North Dakota had the smallest increases of the 10 states evaluated. Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and South Dakota had the largest increases.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Marvin Prater et al (2010) examined the sufficiency of rail rate competition in rural areas and the impact of intramodal competition on rail rates. They found that rail competition for grain and oilseed shipments generally decreased in the 1988-2007 period.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations