2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.03764
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAIL: Robust Acoustic Indoor Localization for Drones

Abstract: Navigating in environments where the GPS signal is unavailable, weak, purposefully blocked, or spoofed has become crucial for a wide range of applications. A prime example is autonomous navigation for drones in indoor environments: to fly fully or partially autonomously, drones demand accurate and frequent updates of their locations. This paper proposes a Robust Acoustic Indoor Localization (RAIL) scheme for drones designed explicitly for GPS-denied environments. Instead of depending on GPS, RAIL leverages ult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, their proposed scheme had high localization errors. In another work [6], Famili et al proposed a multi-path robust system for drones' three-dimensional localization in indoor environments. Even though their proposed scheme fixed the signal separation challenge and eliminated the unnecessary communication link between the drone and the transmitter beacons in the room, they failed to explain the reason behind having a bad 𝑍 -axis estimation and their system lacked the optimal beacon placement analysis.…”
Section: Final Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their proposed scheme had high localization errors. In another work [6], Famili et al proposed a multi-path robust system for drones' three-dimensional localization in indoor environments. Even though their proposed scheme fixed the signal separation challenge and eliminated the unnecessary communication link between the drone and the transmitter beacons in the room, they failed to explain the reason behind having a bad 𝑍 -axis estimation and their system lacked the optimal beacon placement analysis.…”
Section: Final Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology advances, building engineering [13,14] and construction [15][16][17] challenges are being addressed in a variety of ways, particularly with regard to project management [18][19][20], scheduling [21,22], and safety concerns [23,24]. Accordingly, emerging technologies such as virtual reality (VR) [25][26][27], augmented reality (AR) [28,29], wearable sensors [23,30,31], drones [32][33][34][35][36], and BIM [37][38][39][40][41][42] have recently gained increasing attention from the AECO industry because it improves the efficiency, productivity, and safety of projects throughout their life cycle. In the early 2000s, BIM was introduced in pilot projects to support architects and engineers in designing buildings [43].…”
Section: Literature Review and Context Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%