2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3349244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rail to Rail ICMR and High Performance ULV Standard-Cell-Based Comparator for Biomedical and IoT Applications

Riccardo Della Sala,
Francesco Centurelli,
Giuseppe Scotti
et al.

Abstract: In this paper a novel ultra-low voltage (ULV) standard-cell-based comparator which provides rail-to-rail input common-mode range (ICMR) is presented. The topology, unlike the others in the literature, uses only 2-inputs NAND gates and is able to operate with supply voltages as low as 0.15V. A detailed theoretical analysis based on transistor level modeling is provided to explain the operating principle and highlight the performance advantages of the proposed comparator. The circuit has been tested through seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to acknowledge that this analysis overlooks the fact that the second integrator is a time-varying system due to the linear increase of g m is scaled by a factor different from 1/2 yet still less than one. While Equations (10) and (11) are different, they indicate that both topologies exhibit similar responses to FBB in terms of noise. In both scenarios, < V 2 noise > decreases as a function of V th 3,4 and V th 5,6 , consequently worsening the inputreferred noise due to the reduction in threshold voltages caused by FBB.…”
Section: Noise and Offset And Effect Of Fbbmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to acknowledge that this analysis overlooks the fact that the second integrator is a time-varying system due to the linear increase of g m is scaled by a factor different from 1/2 yet still less than one. While Equations (10) and (11) are different, they indicate that both topologies exhibit similar responses to FBB in terms of noise. In both scenarios, < V 2 noise > decreases as a function of V th 3,4 and V th 5,6 , consequently worsening the inputreferred noise due to the reduction in threshold voltages caused by FBB.…”
Section: Noise and Offset And Effect Of Fbbmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The analysis of noise leads to different expressions for the Strong Arm latch and the Elzakker comparator. According to [27], the mean square input-referred noise of the Strong Arm latch can be expressed as (10) where Υ is the noise factor of the FET and V th = V th 3,4 ≈ V th 5,6 . The authors of [27] do not provide an expression for the input-referred noise of the Elzakker comparator; nonetheless, ref.…”
Section: Noise and Offset And Effect Of Fbbmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation