2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railroad privatization and deregulation: Lessons from three decades of experience worldwide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In more favourable circumstances, rail operations are an area where private investment can be attracted to bid for concessions, and there is a solid literature on rail development by private interests (Resor and Laird 2013). One example is the Bombay Jawaharlal Port project where 30% of the 4.5 M TEU transported travel by rail following development of a dedicated freight corridor part financed with equity from users that allows double stacking and thus the transportation of 300 TEUs per train.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more favourable circumstances, rail operations are an area where private investment can be attracted to bid for concessions, and there is a solid literature on rail development by private interests (Resor and Laird 2013). One example is the Bombay Jawaharlal Port project where 30% of the 4.5 M TEU transported travel by rail following development of a dedicated freight corridor part financed with equity from users that allows double stacking and thus the transportation of 300 TEUs per train.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesmo os Estados Unidos, arquétipo da exploração privada, constituiu, por exemplo, uma empresa pública, Consolidated Rail Corporation, para explorar alguns ramais ferroviários de carga deficitários, entre 1980 e 1987 (Resor & Laird, 2013).…”
Section: Titularidade E Propriedadeunclassified
“…Nos Estados Unidos, Canadá, México, Brasil 15 , China e Japão a principal estratégia para mitigar ou mesmo acabar com os efeitos do monopólio natural da firma ferroviária é a segregação geográfica associada a agregação vertical e são considerados casos de sucesso (Resor & Laird, 2013). Em teoria, a melhor opção de competição, ocorre quando a malha é suficientemente grande, pois, diferentes firmas ferroviárias independentes poderiam competir pelos mesmos pares de Origem e Destino (Friebel et al, 2007;Pittman 2004).…”
Section: Competição Por Rotasunclassified