2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railway slab vs ballasted track: A comparison of track geometry degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last two decades, non-ballasted track has been the main choice in railway construction [11]. Ballasted track typically have lower initial capital costs than nonballasted tracks typically and have higher operational costs in comparison to non-ballasted track [12]. Ballasted tracks require higher operating costs than non-ballasted tracks due to more frequent maintenance to maintain the track geometry in line with the original design [13].…”
Section: Type Of Railway Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last two decades, non-ballasted track has been the main choice in railway construction [11]. Ballasted track typically have lower initial capital costs than nonballasted tracks typically and have higher operational costs in comparison to non-ballasted track [12]. Ballasted tracks require higher operating costs than non-ballasted tracks due to more frequent maintenance to maintain the track geometry in line with the original design [13].…”
Section: Type Of Railway Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 Maintenance Cost on Japanese High Speed Rail -Sanyo Shinkansen (modified from [18]) [12] 2.2 Structure of railway track Railway track infrastructure is usually composed of several components that provide stability and durability for safe travel of railway vehicles [19]. This infrastructure can be categorized into two types, namely ballasted and non-ballasted track.…”
Section: Type Of Railway Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in ballasted tracks, the pattern is given by the repeated sleeper arrangement [16,17]; whereas in slab tracks, this is generated by the discrete rail-seats or repeating slab units [18,19,20,21]. Among the various periodic approaches, the 2.5D FEM has been extensively used for train-track-ground simulations in recent years [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Typically, this method is coupled with BE or PML (perfectly matching layers [28]) to account for the wave propagation response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%