2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS 2021
DOI: 10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9554542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railway Track Sleeper Detection in Low Altitude UAV Imagery Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathe et al (2016) discussed using a lightweight drone to detect problems such as missing indicators or cabling (Mathe, et al, 2016). Singh et al (2021) described how they recognized concrete sleepers on train tracks by taking low-altitude aerial photos using a DJI Phantom 3 drone. Their sleeper identification model was based on the YOLO v4 algorithm, which provided optimum speed and accuracy in the object recognition models compared to existing techniques (Singh, Swarup, Agarwal, & Singh, 2019).…”
Section: Rail Defect Identification: Wu Et Al (2018) Proposed An Imag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathe et al (2016) discussed using a lightweight drone to detect problems such as missing indicators or cabling (Mathe, et al, 2016). Singh et al (2021) described how they recognized concrete sleepers on train tracks by taking low-altitude aerial photos using a DJI Phantom 3 drone. Their sleeper identification model was based on the YOLO v4 algorithm, which provided optimum speed and accuracy in the object recognition models compared to existing techniques (Singh, Swarup, Agarwal, & Singh, 2019).…”
Section: Rail Defect Identification: Wu Et Al (2018) Proposed An Imag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al used an object detection model based on the YOLOv4 algorithm to detect railway sleepers using UAV images. They showed that their proposed method could detect railway sleepers with 92% accuracy, 99.10% recall, and 99.08% average accuracy (mAP) success rates [18].…”
Section: Figure 2 Block Diagram For Proposed Approach [14]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray ile bağlantı elemanı arasında herhangi bir yabancı cisim olmadığını varsayarak bu bölgeleri çıkarmak için Mask R-CNN algoritmasını kullanmışlardır. Singh ve arkadaşları [13] İHA görüntülerini kullanarak demiryolu traverslerini tespit etmeyi amaçlamışlardır.…”
Section: Li̇teratür çAlişmalariunclassified