1950
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-195010000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall and Runoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 3 the data are plotted in a frequency curve to see whether it looks roughly like a normal curve. Furthermore the data of the mound-shaped curve of figure 3 can be replotted, as it was done on figure 2, in order to see if it assumes the typical S-shape curve indicating that the data are normally distributed. Yet the S-shape curve indicates only that the original frequency distribution was mound-shaped, and not necessarily that it was normally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 3 the data are plotted in a frequency curve to see whether it looks roughly like a normal curve. Furthermore the data of the mound-shaped curve of figure 3 can be replotted, as it was done on figure 2, in order to see if it assumes the typical S-shape curve indicating that the data are normally distributed. Yet the S-shape curve indicates only that the original frequency distribution was mound-shaped, and not necessarily that it was normally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%