1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(85)90060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall and supply-response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 This explains why our estimated elasticities to negative rainfall shocks are two to three times larger than the symmetric estimate of Jayachandran (2006). Other previous studies that have found non-linear effects of rainfall shocks in India include, for example, Lahiri and Roy (1985) and Gadgil and Gadgil (2006). These papers, however, have a different focus from ours in terms of selected variables and the geographical level of interest.…”
Section: Baseline Specificationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…40 This explains why our estimated elasticities to negative rainfall shocks are two to three times larger than the symmetric estimate of Jayachandran (2006). Other previous studies that have found non-linear effects of rainfall shocks in India include, for example, Lahiri and Roy (1985) and Gadgil and Gadgil (2006). These papers, however, have a different focus from ours in terms of selected variables and the geographical level of interest.…”
Section: Baseline Specificationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…fact, they did not pay much attention to the weather variable; it was taken as one of the control variables. Lahiri and Roy's (1985) work is one of the noteworthy studies in this area. This study is particularly important because it has analyzed the weather factor, i.e., rainfall, very systematically under the assumption that the impact of drought (scarcity of rainfall) is much more than the impact of flood (excess rainfall).…”
Section: Weather In Supply Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depicts that yield is an increasing function of rainfall or temperature, while the latter shows that the equality between the positive or negative effects of weather though quadratic function does not significantly point out the negative impacts on crops. In this regard, the work by Lahiri and Roy (1985) in supply response analysis is an improvement, but the temperature is ignored in the equation since it is a supply response study. The selection of period based on phenological development of crops is something that has been ignored by researchers although Oury (1965) suggested that the aridity index should be taken at three different periods: (1) planting, (2) growing, and (3) harvesting time.…”
Section: Some Limitations Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%