1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00023-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall interception from a lowland tropical rainforest in Brunei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
96
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
19
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, rubber trees partially shed their leaves in pronounced dry periods, which further reduces transpiration by up to 70% explicitly in times of water scarcity. In addition to the much lower re-evaporation of water to the atmosphere, rainfall interception by rubber plantations is 1.7-fold lower than by oil palm plantations (28% of incident rainfall); our values for interception fall into the range of values reported for tropical forests in South East Asia (commonly 10-30%, e.g., Dykes 1997, Kumagai et al 2004, Dietz et al 2006). The differences in transpiration and interception can explain the lower baseflow from oil palm dominated catchments as compared to rubber dominated catchments that we observed.…”
Section: Environmental Perceptions Of Changes In the Local Water Cyclesupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Also, rubber trees partially shed their leaves in pronounced dry periods, which further reduces transpiration by up to 70% explicitly in times of water scarcity. In addition to the much lower re-evaporation of water to the atmosphere, rainfall interception by rubber plantations is 1.7-fold lower than by oil palm plantations (28% of incident rainfall); our values for interception fall into the range of values reported for tropical forests in South East Asia (commonly 10-30%, e.g., Dykes 1997, Kumagai et al 2004, Dietz et al 2006). The differences in transpiration and interception can explain the lower baseflow from oil palm dominated catchments as compared to rubber dominated catchments that we observed.…”
Section: Environmental Perceptions Of Changes In the Local Water Cyclesupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Therefore, producing stemflow with a greater amount in a more efficient manner might be an effective strategy to utilize precipitation by reducing the evaporation loss (Devitt and Smith, 2002;Li et al, 2009), acquire water (Murakami, 2009) and withstand drought (Martinez-Meza and Whitford, 1996). However, because stemflow occurs in a small amount, some studies neglected the dynamics of stemflow yield by setting a fixed percentage of incident precipitation in the range of 1-8 % (Dykes, 1997;Germer et al, 2006;Hagy et al, 2006) or even ignored stemflow while computing the water balance of terrestrial ecosystems (Llorens and Domingo, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016). That underestimated its disproportionately high influence on xerophytic shrub species (Andersson, 1991;Levia and Frost, 2003;.…”
Section: Yuan Et Al: Comparisons Of Stemflow and Its Bio-/abioticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original Gash model (Gash, 1979) demonstrated that the evaporation of the intercepted rainfall could be estimated from the forest structure, the mean evaporation, rainfall rates and rainfall pattern. Although the model has been used with some success over various forests (Leyton et al, 1967;Lloyd et al, 1988;Hutjes et al, 1990;Dykes, 1997;Valente et al, 1997;Aboal et al, 1999;Jackson, 2000;Price and CarlyleMoses, 2003), the model in less suited for application in the sparse forests (Lankreijer et al, 1993;Gash et al, 1995). The original Gash model tends in theory to overestimate the interception loss from sparse forests as it is assumed that the evaporation area (canopy and trunks) extends to the whole plot area, whereas the actual evaporating area is greatly reduced in these types of forests (Teklehaimonot and Jarvis, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%