2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(02)00153-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall manipulation effects on litter decomposition and the microbial biomass of the forest floor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
45
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Wieder and Wright [1995] and AlvarezSanchez and Enriquez [1996] reported significantly higher k values during the wet season, and irrigation delivered during the dry season has also been found to stimulate rates of decomposition [Wieder and Wright, 1995], suggesting that available soil moisture limits rates of litter decomposition. However, in other field manipulative studies, the rate constant in plots exposed to partial rainfall exclusion (approximately 50% of the total monthly rainfall) was similar to that observed in plots receiving full rainfall [Salamanca et al, 2003], suggesting that moderated reductions in water availability may have little direct effect on k. Furthermore, significant rates of litter decomposition can occur in litter humidity and moisture contents as low as 32 and 5%, respectively [Nagy and Macauley, 1982], which is lower than the ambient relative humidity and the surface soil moisture during the dry season [Vourlitis et al, 2002[Vourlitis et al, , 2008. Given the large dry season litter production (Figure 1d), it is conceivable that moisture conditions in the surface litter layer during the dry season were conducive for rapid microbial degradation of surface litter.…”
Section: Litter Decomposition and The Surface Litter Poolsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Wieder and Wright [1995] and AlvarezSanchez and Enriquez [1996] reported significantly higher k values during the wet season, and irrigation delivered during the dry season has also been found to stimulate rates of decomposition [Wieder and Wright, 1995], suggesting that available soil moisture limits rates of litter decomposition. However, in other field manipulative studies, the rate constant in plots exposed to partial rainfall exclusion (approximately 50% of the total monthly rainfall) was similar to that observed in plots receiving full rainfall [Salamanca et al, 2003], suggesting that moderated reductions in water availability may have little direct effect on k. Furthermore, significant rates of litter decomposition can occur in litter humidity and moisture contents as low as 32 and 5%, respectively [Nagy and Macauley, 1982], which is lower than the ambient relative humidity and the surface soil moisture during the dry season [Vourlitis et al, 2002[Vourlitis et al, , 2008. Given the large dry season litter production (Figure 1d), it is conceivable that moisture conditions in the surface litter layer during the dry season were conducive for rapid microbial degradation of surface litter.…”
Section: Litter Decomposition and The Surface Litter Poolsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Salamanca et al [48] found that mass loss of Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, Acer rufinerve, and Pinus densiflora leaf litter, which were protected from rainfall, were lower in comparison to the mass loss of forest floor litter, which was fully exposed to rainfall. According to Swift et al [60], the leaching effect of rainfall enhances mass loss at the initial stage of the decaying process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these studies it was focused on organic matter turnover and N transformations by measuring soil respiration rates, microbial biomass carbon, N mineralization and nitrification (Thomsen et al, 1999;Salamanca et al, 2003;Zaman and Chang, 2004). Bioavailable P from organic manures is mainly in the dissolved form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%