1989
DOI: 10.1080/02640828908723985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising infrastructure charges on land development: Incidence and adjustments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delaney & Smith (1989) and Hodge & Cameron (1989) show that the incidence of DCCs depends on the supply elasticity of raw land, which is affected by the structure of the development industry in the region, by the extent of land banking by developers, and by their ability to act as an oligopoly and agree to hold land off the market to raise its price. Pricing policies have to account for these differences and consider the behaviour of landowners.…”
Section: The Conceptual Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delaney & Smith (1989) and Hodge & Cameron (1989) show that the incidence of DCCs depends on the supply elasticity of raw land, which is affected by the structure of the development industry in the region, by the extent of land banking by developers, and by their ability to act as an oligopoly and agree to hold land off the market to raise its price. Pricing policies have to account for these differences and consider the behaviour of landowners.…”
Section: The Conceptual Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from taxes, governments may levy charges to fund infrastructure for a particular development or community as well. Such charges are known as “infrastructure contributions” in Australia (UDIA, 2008), “infrastructure charges” in the UK (Hodge and Cameron, 1989), and “development impact fees” in the USA (Skaburskis, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%