2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0265051701000341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising standards in performance

Abstract: Over the past few years, instrumental performance has been subject to considerable research in this journal and elsewhere. A great deal of this research has concentrated on the practice strategies and individual lessons, which most students undertake in preparing as performers. Little has been done on raising standards of performance on a larger scale within the context of a large music department. This article describes the outcomes of a two-year programme undertaken with undergraduates at Barnsley College. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance, studio learning, and private practice all provided contexts for potential mastery experiences. Corresponding with Davis and Pulman (2001) and Marshall (2011), all participants reported that tangible evidence of performance success helped them feel confident in their progress, capability, and performance potential. Data highlighted, however, that the degree to which a participant’s vocal performance belief was affected by performance experiences was mediated by the individual’s perception of the performance event (see Bandura, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Performance, studio learning, and private practice all provided contexts for potential mastery experiences. Corresponding with Davis and Pulman (2001) and Marshall (2011), all participants reported that tangible evidence of performance success helped them feel confident in their progress, capability, and performance potential. Data highlighted, however, that the degree to which a participant’s vocal performance belief was affected by performance experiences was mediated by the individual’s perception of the performance event (see Bandura, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Participants iterated methods related to the development of mastery experiences, including drilling the basics, utilizing repetition, and focusing on technical ability through a process of scaffolding-strategies with the intent to improve performance in ways that are reflective of deliberate practice, as described by Ericsson et al (1993). In addition, participants indicated that teachers provided tools by which students might accurately self-assess, similar to findings of Daniel (2001), Davis andPulman (2001), andHirschorn (2011). In essence, when teachers provide students with information regarding productive practice and self-assessment, students may be better enabled to have mastery experiences independent of teacher assessments (see Nielsen, 2004).…”
Section: Belief-enhancing Teaching Methods-the Sources Of Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Observation can also occur in managed contexts including group instrumental/vocal learning (Davis & Pulman, 2001;Daniel, 2004bDaniel, , 2006, peer assessment (Hunter & Russ, 1996;Blom & Poole, 2004;Daniel, 2004a) and self-assessment through video analysis (Daniel, 2001). In research by Hunter and Russ (1996), Daniel (2001Daniel ( , 2004a and Blom and Poole (2004), undergraduate students received instruction in what to consider while observing performance.…”
Section: O B S E R V a T I O N W I T H I N M U S I C A L S K I L L L mentioning
confidence: 99%