2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising the bar: Can dual scanning improve our understanding of joint action?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification analyses with supervised learning can be performed as well in order to characterize the accuracy of different connectivity measures used for discrimination between behavioral conditions. For instance, Support Vector Machines have been used in a previous HS study to characterize the contributions of inter-brain and intra-brain connectivity measures in classifying dyadic interactions compared to individual interactions with computers during a visuomotor task [ 45 ]. Another study used a classifier based on Riemannian geometry to discriminate between different emotional states of interacting partners [ 46 ].…”
Section: Eeg Hyperscanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification analyses with supervised learning can be performed as well in order to characterize the accuracy of different connectivity measures used for discrimination between behavioral conditions. For instance, Support Vector Machines have been used in a previous HS study to characterize the contributions of inter-brain and intra-brain connectivity measures in classifying dyadic interactions compared to individual interactions with computers during a visuomotor task [ 45 ]. Another study used a classifier based on Riemannian geometry to discriminate between different emotional states of interacting partners [ 46 ].…”
Section: Eeg Hyperscanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, additional control conditions would be desirable. For instance, a condition in which the participants are jointly interacting with the computer would allow the removal of synchronization with a human agent (Astolfi et al, 2020). With this type of control, we would be able to further interpret the results in terms of agency effects.…”
Section: Gamma Interbrain Coupling As a Marker Of Prosocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this type of control, we would be able to further interpret the results in terms of agency effects. Future studies should adopt improved experimental control (Astolfi et al, 2020) and the use of data-association measures addressing covariance between brain signals with precise localization of synchrony in time and frequency (e.g., Hemakom et al, 2017). Additionally, the use of source reconstruction techniques will be highly desirable for more precise localization of the underlying areas supporting the differential processing.…”
Section: Gamma Interbrain Coupling As a Marker Of Prosocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to single-person experimental designs that have dominated neuroscience (Astolfi et al, 2020), twoperson or "multi-brain" neuroscience (Hasson et al, 2012) provides a framework to investigate the inter-brain dynamics that underlie social interactions (Liu and Pelowski, 2014). Montague et al (2002) coined the term "hyperscanning, " the simultaneous quantification of inter-brain coupling across multiple participants, in their germinal paper inaugurating this new method for conducting research into the nascent field of social neuroscience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%