2022
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising the standards of patient‐centered outcomes research in myelodysplastic syndromes: Clinical utility and validation of the subscales of the QUALMS from the MDS‐RIGHT project

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Raising the standards of patient-centered outcomes research in myelodysplastic syndromes : Clinical utility and validation of the subscales of the QUALMS from the MDS-RIGHT project.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of patients were enrolled in Italian centers thereby hampering a thorough analysis on potential differences by geographical regions. Also, our HRQoL profile description is confined to aspects measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and other MDS-specific HRQoL questionnaires [36][37][38] could have revealed additional valuable information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of patients were enrolled in Italian centers thereby hampering a thorough analysis on potential differences by geographical regions. Also, our HRQoL profile description is confined to aspects measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and other MDS-specific HRQoL questionnaires [36][37][38] could have revealed additional valuable information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the recently developed QUALMS has three subscales assessing physical burden (QUALMS‐P), emotional burden (QUALMS‐E), and benefit finding (QUALMS‐BF), plus a total QUALMS score 64,65 . Therefore, a hypothetical trial using only this questionnaire should clearly identify which specific scale will be used as the primary endpoint of the PRO analysis.…”
Section: Key Selected Aspects To Consider During Protocol Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the recently developed QUALMS has three subscales assessing physical burden (QUALMS‐P), emotional burden (QUALMS‐E), and benefit finding (QUALMS‐BF), plus a total QUALMS score. 64 , 65 Therefore, a hypothetical trial using only this questionnaire should clearly identify which specific scale will be used as the primary endpoint of the PRO analysis. If a new drug is felt to ameliorate anemia and hopefully reduce the physical burden of fatigue, then the QUALMS‐P is appropriate; if a new oral form of an older drug is felt to reduce the stress of disease management by decreasing clinic visit burden, then the QUALMS‐E or total QUALMS is likely more appropriate.…”
Section: Key Selected Aspects To Consider During Protocol Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively recent development of a validated MDS-specific quality of life assessment tool, the QUALMS score (https://qualms.dana-farber.org/), is expected to improve the reliability of these assessments in clinical trials. This instrument has been endorsed by the international MDS community and regulatory bodies [11 ▪▪ ,34 ▪ ,35 ▪ ].…”
Section: Transfusing Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…New approaches to the measurement of quality of life in MDS reveal that not all patients benefit equally from transfusions; our transfusion goals may be too high in some and too low in others [10 ▪▪ ]. The recent development of a simple MDS-specific standardized instrument (QUALMS) for measurement of quality of life may help us to unravel some of the complexity in this regard [11 ▪▪ ]. Thus, effectively measuring whether transfused patients are deriving clinical benefit, and identifying and treating those who have developed or are developing iron overload are immediately actionable targets for optimized management in our patients with lower risk MDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%