2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0752-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raltitrexed increases radiation sensitivity of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells

Abstract: Background Radiation therapy remains an important therapeutic modality, especially for those patients who are not candidates for radical resection. Many strategies have been developed to increase the radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer, with some success. Methods This study was conducted to determine whether raltitrexed can enhance radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). ESCC cell lines 24 h were incubated with raltitrexed or DMSO with or withou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the uracil distribution pattern in drug-treated cells shows correlation with the early replication timing, we wish to directly investigate if there is any cell cycle arrest occurring under our experimental conditions. Figure 5 shows characteristic scatter plots indicating an expected cell cycle arrest in the drug-treated cells, namely delayed S-phase entry and progression ( Blackledge, 1998 ; Ding et al, 2019 ; Huehls et al, 2016 ; Yan et al, 2016 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ). In agreement with the literature ( Luo et al, 2008 ), our data clearly show no observable cell cycle effect of UGI expression in our non-treated samples ( Figure 5A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the uracil distribution pattern in drug-treated cells shows correlation with the early replication timing, we wish to directly investigate if there is any cell cycle arrest occurring under our experimental conditions. Figure 5 shows characteristic scatter plots indicating an expected cell cycle arrest in the drug-treated cells, namely delayed S-phase entry and progression ( Blackledge, 1998 ; Ding et al, 2019 ; Huehls et al, 2016 ; Yan et al, 2016 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ). In agreement with the literature ( Luo et al, 2008 ), our data clearly show no observable cell cycle effect of UGI expression in our non-treated samples ( Figure 5A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypic differences in cell cycle progression upon the two drug treatments were also reported. The 5FdUR treatment was shown to cause an S-phase arrest in the second cycle ( Huehls et al, 2016 ; Yan et al, 2016 ), while the actual time point of cell cycle arrest upon RTX treatment is still controversial ( Blackledge, 1998 ; Ding et al, 2019 ; Zhao et al, 2016 ). Similarly, we also detected slightly altered cell cycle distribution patterns in case of the two drug treatments, which were differently influenced by the MMR status ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypic differences in cell-cycle progression upon the two drug treatments were also reported. The 5FdUR treatment was shown to cause an S-phase arrest in the second cycle (Huehls et al, 2016; Yan et al, 2016), while the actual time point of cell-cycle arrest upon RTX treatment is still controversial (Blackledge, 1998; Ding et al, 2019; Zhao, Zhang, Sun, Zhan, & Zhao, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are a few reports on raltitrexed combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma [20,21], the clinical experience of raltitrexed in patients with ESCC is still unavailable. Recently, Ding et al reported that raltitrexed could decrease cell viability and proliferation, cause apoptosis and enhance the radiosensitivity of ESCC cells [22]. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer, raltitrexed has produced comparable efficacy as first line treatment when compared to 5-FU-based regimen [9] and still showed activity when combined with irinotecan as second line chemotherapy [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%