2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ram pressure stripping made easy: an analytical approach

Abstract: The removal of gas by ram pressure stripping of galaxies is treated by a purely kinematic description. The solution has two asymptotic limits: if the duration of the ram pressure pulse exceeds the period of vertical oscillations perpendicular to the galactic plane, the commonly used quasi-static criterion of Gunn & Gott is obtained which uses the maximum ram pressure that the galaxy has experienced along its orbit. For shorter pulses the outcome depends on the time-integrated ram pressure. This parameter pair … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the discovery of one-headed HI tails, in some cases pointing away from the Xray centre of clusters, has provided even more direct proof for the importance of stripping in removing cold hydrogen from the starforming disc (e.g., Oosterloo & van Gorkom 2005;Chung et al 2007;Ramatsoku et al 2019;Deb et al 2020). Indeed, for the typical ICM density of ∼10 -3 cm -3 inferred from X-ray observations, infalling velocities of ∼1 000 km s −1 are enough for ram pressure to strip at least part of the atomic hydrogen content from the starforming disc of galaxies (Gunn & Gott 1972;Köppen et al 2018).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, the discovery of one-headed HI tails, in some cases pointing away from the Xray centre of clusters, has provided even more direct proof for the importance of stripping in removing cold hydrogen from the starforming disc (e.g., Oosterloo & van Gorkom 2005;Chung et al 2007;Ramatsoku et al 2019;Deb et al 2020). Indeed, for the typical ICM density of ∼10 -3 cm -3 inferred from X-ray observations, infalling velocities of ∼1 000 km s −1 are enough for ram pressure to strip at least part of the atomic hydrogen content from the starforming disc of galaxies (Gunn & Gott 1972;Köppen et al 2018).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is clear that, for surface densities typically observed at a galaxy's optical radius (e.g., Leroy et al 2008;Sánchez Almeida 2020), ram pressure can be strong enough, even for IGM densities a factor of a few smaller and orbital velocities five times slower than for galaxies passing through the centre of massive clusters (see also the modelling presented by Hester 2006 andKöppen et al 2018).…”
Section: Is Ram Pressure Efficient In the Group Environment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrated using statistical analyses that our 10 most confident detections are too bright, extended and coherent to be a result of noise. The predictions from the Köppen et al (2018) model appear to hold true. Furthermore we can make a quantitative prediction for future surveys that streams will be most commonly associated with galaxies with P loc /P req 0.2.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Using the Köppen et al (2018) model, and assuming radial infall, we can estimate the point at which the ram pressure becomes sufficient to start removing gas from the galaxy. We assume this occurs when the ratio P loc /P req ≥ 0.5.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the gravitational restoring force at a given radius, 𝑟, within the disc of a galaxy can be estimated from (e.g. Roediger & Brüggen 2006;Köppen et al 2018),…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%