Ramal-Inklination in der Frontalebene nach bimaxillärer orthognatischer Chirurgie bei skelettaler Klasse-III-Gesichtsasymmetrie

Park, Eunhye; Ha, Ae-Rim; Kim, Kyung‐A; Park, Ki Ho; Kang, Yoon‐Goo

doi:10.1007/s00056-021-00344-9

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Supplementary Table 3 summarizes the NOS results. Most of the studies were assessed as moderate quality, 12 - 48 while a few were assessed as high quality. 14 , 49 - 62 The studies were classified as high quality when the comparability of cohorts was appropriately addressed based on the study design or analysis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a comprehensive review involving 44 studies, 12 - 43 , 49 - 60 77 outcome indicators were analyzed to assess skeletal symmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. The SMDs of skeletal symmetry according to one- and two-jaw surgery are shown in Figure 2 , with descriptions of the study groups and outcome variables in Table 3 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In patients with a translation asymmetry type, transverse movement of the distal segment results in correction of frontal ramal inclination with stability and improves soft tissue facial contour. 15 , 20 A study comparing 2D and 3D planning in cleft patients with severe discrepancies showed that 3D planning yielded superior outcomes in terms of facial contour asymmetry, but we excluded the study due to cleft palate patients. 66 Additionally, Udomlarptham et al 12 concluded that 3D planning was particularly advantageous to achieve bilateral mandibular contour symmetry.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Treatment outcome and long-term stability of orthognathic surgery for facial asymmetry: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kim,

Jha

et al. 2024

Korean J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This systematic review aimed to provide a comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes, including hard and soft tissues, postoperative stability, temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and quality of life (QoL), in patients with facial asymmetry who underwent orthognathic surgery. Methods The primary objective was to address the question, “How do different factors related to surgery affect the outcomes and stability of orthognathic surgery in the correction of facial asymmetry?” A meta-analysis was conducted on the outcome parameters, such as skeletal, dental, and soft tissue symmetry, TMD, QoL, and relapse, using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method for random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted considering surgery-related factors such as surgical techniques (one-jaw vs. two-jaw), use of the surgery-first approach, utilization of computer simulation, and analytical methods employed to evaluate asymmetry (2D vs. 3D). Results Forty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the symmetry of hard and soft tissues. The subgroup analysis indicated that the treatment outcomes showed significant improvement, regardless of the factors related to surgery. Changes in TMD signs and symptoms varied according to the surgical technique used. Quality of life improved in the facial, oral, and social domains. Skeletal relapse was observed during the follow-up. Conclusions Our findings support the positive outcomes of orthognathic surgery in the treatment of facial asymmetry in terms of skeletal and soft tissue improvements, stability, relief of TMD symptoms, and enhancement of QoL. However, most of the included studies showed a low certainty of evidence and high heterogeneity.

show abstract