1996
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(96)00226-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman-LIF measurements of temperature, major species, OH, and NO in a methane-air bunsen flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial resolution of measurements has been estimated to be approximately 750 μm [16,23,24]. A quick estimation of the chemical length scale tells us that it is of the same order of magnitude as the probe resolution:…”
Section: A Priori Validation Of Fgm Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial resolution of measurements has been estimated to be approximately 750 μm [16,23,24]. A quick estimation of the chemical length scale tells us that it is of the same order of magnitude as the probe resolution:…”
Section: A Priori Validation Of Fgm Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The line-imaging Raman/Rayleigh scattering instrument at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) provides instantaneous measurements of temperature and major species concentrations (N 2 , O 2 , CO 2 , CO, H 2 O, H 2 and CH 4 ) in flames, over a 6 mm probe line, with a spatial resolution of ~100 microns. The instrument is routinely applied to measurements in laboratory-scale flames that are specifically designed to advance the understanding of the turbulence-chemistry interaction, and to provide validation databases for computational models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weaker Raman signal from methane is located in the 1200-1900 cm -1 range resulting from a CH 2 bending mode, causing a crosstalk onto the CO 2 (1133-1489 cm -1 ) and O 2 (1489-1662 cm -1 ) Raman channels. The methane Raman signals in the CO 2 and O 2 channels are sensitive to the bowing effect, with ~10% changes in the integrated Raman scattering intensity between the center and the edge of the 6 mm probe line. Since the methane crosstalk is an order of magnitude weaker than the CO 2 and O 2 Raman signal, the error in the concentration caused by neglecting the bowing effect is less than 1% for typical methane-air flame compositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the available methods include laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) using excitation at 193 or 226 nm; [8][9][10][11][12][13] vibrational and pure-rotational coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) spectroscopy; [14][15][16][17] and spontaneous Raman scattering. [18][19][20][21][22] Assuming thermal equilibrium, it is possible to determine the population of excited oxygen from a combined measurement of the ground state population and the temperature. However, this assumption can hardly be justified in the vicinity of the reaction zone in a flame where the complex chemistry produces nonequilibrium species such as radicals in electronically excited states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%