1982
DOI: 10.1063/1.443209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman scattering: Investigation of nematic and smectic ordering

Abstract: Quantitative measurements of vibrational Raman depolarization ratios have been used to study molecular orientational order in nematic and for the first time, in smectic liquid crystals. Temperature dependence of the depolarization ratios of the terminal C≡N and the central biphenyl link vibrational bands of two alkylcyanobiphenyl compounds (CBn) and a cyclohexane derivative (PCH7) has been investigated extensively. Two experimental technics have been used: a conventional triple monochromator and the Raman micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, small fluctuations in local ordering always occur, and the finite size of our simulation box guarantees that the diagonalization of Q~ always produces a small non-zero value for S. An alternative approach suggested by Eppenga and Frenkel [15] is to define S as Both (P2(cos 0)) and (P4(cos 0)) are readily amenable to experimental measurement [18]. P2 may be obtained from a range of experimental methods [19] including nuclear magnetic resonance, magnetic susceptibility and refractive index measurements, while P4 values are available from optical [22][23][24] (Raman scattering and two-photon dichroism) and X-ray techniques [25]. Optical measurements have suggested that (P4(cos0)) values become negative at temperatures just below the phase transition contrary to the predictions of both mean field [20] and Onsager theories [21,22].…”
Section: Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, small fluctuations in local ordering always occur, and the finite size of our simulation box guarantees that the diagonalization of Q~ always produces a small non-zero value for S. An alternative approach suggested by Eppenga and Frenkel [15] is to define S as Both (P2(cos 0)) and (P4(cos 0)) are readily amenable to experimental measurement [18]. P2 may be obtained from a range of experimental methods [19] including nuclear magnetic resonance, magnetic susceptibility and refractive index measurements, while P4 values are available from optical [22][23][24] (Raman scattering and two-photon dichroism) and X-ray techniques [25]. Optical measurements have suggested that (P4(cos0)) values become negative at temperatures just below the phase transition contrary to the predictions of both mean field [20] and Onsager theories [21,22].…”
Section: Phase Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constant and Decoster [8], using a Raman microprobe, reported spurious effects on the incident and scattered light polarizations due to these fluctuations for thicknesses larger than SO pm. O n thc contrary, Jen et ul.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, we are interested in the propagation along oz, the global Ram p symmetric 3 Â 3 tensor is reduced to the 2 Â 2 tensor referring to the ox and oy axes. This general formulation (11) can be inserted in the intensity (10) depending on the mode under study. For the sake of simplicity and to go on with our calculation, we restrict our study to stretching mode of bond practically parallel to the molecule.…”
Section: Expression Of the Raman Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected Raman intensity can therefore be calculated from (9) and (10), inserting the correct expression of the Raman operator, either (11) in the very general case or (14) for studies of a stretching mode. These intensities can be plot with respect to either the angle f cell (polar plots) or the height position z 0 (zscan plots).…”
Section: Expression Of the Raman Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation