2019
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.963.424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman Spectroscopy Characterization of Ion Implanted 4H-SiC

Abstract: Raman spectroscopy and sheet resistance measurements were used to study the preparation processes of low-resistance p-type 4H-SiC by Al ion implantation with ion doses of 2.45×1012 - 9.0×1014 cm-2 and annealing treatment with temperatures of 1700 - 1900 °C. Greatly different from the LOPC (longitudinal optical phonon-plasmon coupled) Raman mode found from the sample of doping 4H-SiC during epitaxial growth, no significant influence on the surface concentration could be found for the longitudinal optical (LO) m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For samples Q1, Q2, and Q3, the LOPC mode relationships in Figure 8d corresponded well to our previous single Raman spectrum results focusing on the sample surface [20]: when the surface Al carrier concentration was equal or larger than 10 18 cm −3 (i.e., Q3), the LOPC mode showed a blue shift whereas no apparent difference was found in the LOPC peak position between Q1 and Q2. Figure 8a,b in the whole range of depth profiling, the R 2 (coefficient of determination) was in the range of 0.964-0.998; the standard error of LOPC mode position was in the range of 0.31-0.46 cm −1 , and the standard error of the LO mode peak position was between 0.01-0.15 cm −1 .…”
Section: Depth Profiling Of Net Doping Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For samples Q1, Q2, and Q3, the LOPC mode relationships in Figure 8d corresponded well to our previous single Raman spectrum results focusing on the sample surface [20]: when the surface Al carrier concentration was equal or larger than 10 18 cm −3 (i.e., Q3), the LOPC mode showed a blue shift whereas no apparent difference was found in the LOPC peak position between Q1 and Q2. Figure 8a,b in the whole range of depth profiling, the R 2 (coefficient of determination) was in the range of 0.964-0.998; the standard error of LOPC mode position was in the range of 0.31-0.46 cm −1 , and the standard error of the LO mode peak position was between 0.01-0.15 cm −1 .…”
Section: Depth Profiling Of Net Doping Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the backscattering geometric configuration, A 1 modes (longitudinal acoustic mode (LA mode) at 610 cm −1 , LO mode at 964 cm −1 , and LOPC mode at~980 cm −1 ), E 2 mode at 776 cm −1 , E 1 mode at 797 cm −1 , and the second order Raman peaks can be observed. The spectra showed two overlapping peaks in the range of 950-1000 cm −1 (framed with red dashed lines in Figure 3a,b, which were the longitudinal optical mode (LO mode) located at 964 cm −1 and the LOPC peak located at around 980 cm −1 [20], respectively. As the diameter of the confocal pinhole becomes smaller or the numerical aperture of the objective lens becomes larger, the LOPC peak information is filtered out more, so the LOPC information is assumed to be derived from the substrate of the sample.…”
Section: Depth Profiling Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, due to the smaller energy gap to the valence band and a strong tendency to occupy atomic sites in the silicon sublattice [5,6], and since Al does not appear an abnormal out-diffusion phenomenon as B-doped SiC during annealing [7], Al is preferred. Influenced by constraints such as doping amount and impurity atomic distribution, lowresistance p-type SiC preparation is still a difficult problem to be solved [8], because of ion implantation-induced defects which severely limit carrier lifetime and the effectiveness of doping [9]. Korsunska et al [10] found the recombination centers in 4H-SiC using photoluminescence (PL) spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were further modified by Al or N ion implantation. More details on the preparation of samples Q1, Q4 and Q3 can be found elsewhere [24] and samples epi, A-N and A-P were prepared similarly. The thickness of the layer modified by ion implantation was approximately 300 nm.…”
Section: Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%