2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10347-019-0582-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramp reef depositional facies model for the Mid-Pliocene Golden Gates Reef Member of the Tamiami Formation, South Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissolution in the studied carbonates resulted in the development of several types of pores, including intergranular, moldic, and vuggy porosity (Figure 7e). Dissolution process of the metastable minerals has been followed by precipitation of calcite in dissolved parts and among grains (Figure 7f) (Meeder, Klaus, & Grasmueck, 2019). The filling of biomoldic porosity by blocky and drusy cements suggests diagenesis in the meteoric phreatic setting (Longman, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolution in the studied carbonates resulted in the development of several types of pores, including intergranular, moldic, and vuggy porosity (Figure 7e). Dissolution process of the metastable minerals has been followed by precipitation of calcite in dissolved parts and among grains (Figure 7f) (Meeder, Klaus, & Grasmueck, 2019). The filling of biomoldic porosity by blocky and drusy cements suggests diagenesis in the meteoric phreatic setting (Longman, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), fine nodular phosphate, grey Limestone, wackestone Supratidal (Gomez & Astini, 2015;Shinn, 1983) B/A T Tamiami Formation Limestone, wackestone, moderately hard, laminations, sandy Calcitic shell with fine quartz sand Intertidal (Gebelin, 1977;Sussko & Davis, 1992) A/K Tamiami Formation Unconsolidated calcitic shell with up to 40% very fine grained quartz sand. May contain small, oyster fragments, grey Quartz sand with trace of sand-sized skeletal fragments Intertidal (Gomez & Astini, 2015;Shinn, 1983) A/J Tamiami Formation Unconsolidated quartz sand, fine to very fine, dark brownish grey, organics Limestone, wackestone, intraclasts, sandy Supratidal (Hardie, 1977;(Hardie & Shinn, 1988;Missimer, 1970) A/I Tamiami Formation Limestone, wackestone, moderately indurated, intraclasts Unlithified, quartz sand and shell Shallow offshore, shelf (Meeder, 1987;Zeller et al, 2015) C/C (Meeder, 1987;Perkins, 1977) C/C D Caloosahatchee Formation Predominantly sandy skeletal wackestone, some packstone, distribution of quartz sand highly variable…”
Section: Caloosahatchee Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlithified quartz sand and shell Beach or very proximal subtidal (offshore) (Allmon, 1992) C/C C Caloosahatchee Formation Numerous mollusc types, no mud, may be death assemblage Sandy molluscan wackestone Offshore, shallow shelf (Holmes, 1988;Meeder, 1987) C/C B Caloosahatchee Formation Sandy wackestone, variable composition with sand shell, and mud, not proximal to beach, but shallow water Sandy wackestone/ packstone Discontinuity crust, onshore (Gerdes & Krumbein, 1987;Goudie, 1973;Multer & Hoffmeister, 1968) C/C A Caloosahatchee Formation Sandy wackestone/packstone, sandstone in place, very hard, some laminations of quartz sand and mud Sandy, wackestone, freshwater Interior wetland marl (Pederson et al, 2019) B/80 east base Fort Thompson, Formation Sandy wackestone, lime mud with freshwater molluscs, slightly sandy…”
Section: Caloosahatchee Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, Hunter (1968) subdivided the Tamiami Formation into five members: the Ochopee Limestone Member, Buckingham Limestone Member, Pinecrest Sand Member, Murdock Station Member, and the Bayshore Clay Member. A sixth member, the Golden Gate Reef Member, was later described by Meeder (1979). This entire sequence of the Tamiami Formation was constrained to an age of 4.95 to 1.95 Ma via strontium isotopic geochronology (Missimer, 1992), which encompasses almost all of the Pliocene as well as the early Pleistocene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%