Oxford Music Online 2014
DOI: 10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.a2263029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramsey, Buck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Illumina MiSeq paired raw reads were subject to quality filtering using Sickle (Joshi and Fass, 2011) and assembled into contigs with MEGAHIT assembler (Li et al, 2015). PROKKA pipeline was used to find and annotate genes using the default settings (Seemann, 2014). Reads were mapped to contigs with Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) and counting was performed with HTSeq (Anders et al, 2015).…”
Section: Metagenome Sequencing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illumina MiSeq paired raw reads were subject to quality filtering using Sickle (Joshi and Fass, 2011) and assembled into contigs with MEGAHIT assembler (Li et al, 2015). PROKKA pipeline was used to find and annotate genes using the default settings (Seemann, 2014). Reads were mapped to contigs with Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) and counting was performed with HTSeq (Anders et al, 2015).…”
Section: Metagenome Sequencing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 For efficiency, TORMES also uses Parallel. 57 The TORMES pipeline also included ABRicate 58 to screen genomes for matches to VFDB 26 entries using ABRicate. The genus/species name based on Kraken 2.0.9beta prediction using the MiniKra-ken2_v1 database was used as the isolate name.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomic classification of contigs was assigned by BLASTn 67 according to the taxonomy of the single-copy marker genes in contigs. SSU rRNA sequences in contigs were identified using Barrnap 68 and classified using VSEARCH 69 . The mapping, re-assembly, and rebinning process was repeated 5-7 times until the quality of the genomes could not be improved further.…”
Section: Genome Binning and Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome annotation was conducted using Prokka v1.13 72 , eggNOG 73 , and BlastKoala 74 using the KEGG database. The functional assignments of genes of interest were also confirmed using BLASTp 68 against the NCBI RefSeq database. The metabolic pathways were reconstructed using KEGG Mapper 75 .…”
Section: Genome Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%