2011
DOI: 10.5840/symposium201115227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rancière’s Productive Contradictions

Abstract: This article explores the force and limitations of Jacques Rancière's novel attempt to rethink the relationship between aesthetics and politics. In particular, it unravels the paradoxical threads of the fundamental contradiction between two of his steadfast claims: (1) art and politics are consubstantial, and (2) art and politics never truly merge. In taking Rancière to task on this point, the primary objective of this article is to work through the nuances of his project and foreground the problems inherent t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, I disagree that such clear distinctions can be made between the two (aesthetics and aesthesis) and am interested instead in how the two are intertwined through emotive and sense-making apparatuses. Moving beyond such confined definitions, scholars have broadened the notion of aesthetics as the entire sensorial composition of our worlds (Ponce de León, 2021;Rancière, 2009;Rockhill, 2011Rockhill, , 2017Wynter, 1992).…”
Section: Decolonizing Aesthetics-decolonial Art and Art Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, I disagree that such clear distinctions can be made between the two (aesthetics and aesthesis) and am interested instead in how the two are intertwined through emotive and sense-making apparatuses. Moving beyond such confined definitions, scholars have broadened the notion of aesthetics as the entire sensorial composition of our worlds (Ponce de León, 2021;Rancière, 2009;Rockhill, 2011Rockhill, , 2017Wynter, 1992).…”
Section: Decolonizing Aesthetics-decolonial Art and Art Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rancière, on the other hand, talks about aesthetics as 'a mode of articulation between ways of doing and making, their corresponding forms of visibility, and possible ways of thinking about their relationships'. 66 Despite what Rockhill has argued are fundamental contradictions in Rancière's discussion of the relationship between art and politics, 67 and the confusion the philosopher's work allows to 'slip in below the turgid surface of [his] pronouncements, 68 Rancière's approach to aesthetics is much more inclusive of a work's different functions ('doing and making') than Bishop's discussion might suggest. Indeed, reflecting on a participatory or media art project's ways of 'doing and making', their 'corresponding forms of visibility' and the possible 'relationships' between the two is crucial in developing an aesthetic system that is relevant to those particular practices by acknowledging that their social, political, connective or networking functions generate the forms (or challenge the 'a priori forms') that render the work presentable to 'sense experience'.…”
Section: Five: the Threat Of New Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%