1979
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(79)90064-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random crustal magnetization and its effect on coherence of short-wavelength marine magnetic anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, results from the North Atlantic [Hall and Ryall, 1977;Levi, 1979] show magnetic units containing both polarities, intermediate directions, and large differences in intensity. Moreover, some of these units extend laterally for at least 100 m [Hall and Ryall, 1977]• and these units can produce short-wavelength anomalies at the ocegi• surface [Schouten and Denham, 1979;Blakely, 1979]. Unfortunately, the DSDP has yet to perform the first-order experiment: to drill into crust within a region of rapid spreading rate and orderly magnetic anomalies, such as the areas of Figure 2.…”
Section: The Depth To the Magnetic Source Z Is Equal To The Depth To supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Instead, results from the North Atlantic [Hall and Ryall, 1977;Levi, 1979] show magnetic units containing both polarities, intermediate directions, and large differences in intensity. Moreover, some of these units extend laterally for at least 100 m [Hall and Ryall, 1977]• and these units can produce short-wavelength anomalies at the ocegi• surface [Schouten and Denham, 1979;Blakely, 1979]. Unfortunately, the DSDP has yet to perform the first-order experiment: to drill into crust within a region of rapid spreading rate and orderly magnetic anomalies, such as the areas of Figure 2.…”
Section: The Depth To the Magnetic Source Z Is Equal To The Depth To supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Likewise, it remains to be an open question on the mechanisms of lower crust and upper mantle magnetization as well as their contribution to surface magnetic anomalies [38]. In fact, these types of questions and arguments have existed ever since the early buildup of the Vine-Matthews model [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Earlier, magnetic sources causing seafloor spreading magnetic anomalies are thought to be confined within the shallow part of the oceanic crust, but satellite magnetic anomalies and ODP drilling confirm that these magnetic sources can be deep seated, and the gabbro layer of the lower crust can also contribute appreciably to surface magnetic anomalies.…”
Section: Deep Magnetic Layer Structure and Thermal Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoothing of the geomagnetic field reversal signal which provides information on the width of the emplacement zone has been modelled with discrete random and highfrequency emplacement of the magnetic source (Matthews & Bath 1967;Harrison 1968;Blakely & Cox 1972;Schouten & McCamy 1972;Atwater & Mudie 1973;Blakely 1974;. The random noise which affects the coherence of marine magnetic anomalies and which provides information on the size and number of discrete magnetic units in the magnetic source layer has been modelled with discrete random but low-frequency emplacement (Matthews & Bath 1967;Blakely 1979).…”
Section: Stochastic Models For the Marine Magnetic Anomaly Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-frequency emplacement of the extrusive flows is the most likely contributor to the noise observed in marine magnetic anomalies because it generates a laterally inhomogeneous extrusive source layer (Blakely 1979) of variable thickness .…”
Section: Stochastic Models For the Marine Magnetic Anomaly Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%