2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2017.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random cutting plane approach for identifying volumetric features in a CAD mesh model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing with existing recent approaches such as Muraleedharan et al [22], Adhikary et al [14], Attene et al [12], RANSAC [16], Le and Daun [15] and other on benchmark test cases, the proposed technique successfully recognized the features such as blends, compound holes and their interactions and found to be robust and consistent with coverage of more than 95% in addressing volumetric feature. The proposed approach is simple, more general and more reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing with existing recent approaches such as Muraleedharan et al [22], Adhikary et al [14], Attene et al [12], RANSAC [16], Le and Daun [15] and other on benchmark test cases, the proposed technique successfully recognized the features such as blends, compound holes and their interactions and found to be robust and consistent with coverage of more than 95% in addressing volumetric feature. The proposed approach is simple, more general and more reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Failure cases for intersecting volumetric feature Failure case of Muraleedharan et al[22], Adhikary et al[14] and Attene et.al[12] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Sunil and Pande [8] have attempted to recognize hole, dimple, flange, ridge, bend while Adhikary and Gurumoorthy [20] recognized and extracted free-form volumetric features. Muraleedharan et al [21] identified holes, slots, pockets as well as interacting features CAD mesh model, but could not recognize chamfer, fillet, and blends. From a literature review, it is evident that most of the researchers have focused on extracting limited and comparatively simple features.…”
Section: Literature Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their algorithm depends on the choice of "Minimum feature dimension" and must be known in advance before feature extraction. Muraleedharan et al [21] used a random cutting plane approach for feature extraction. However, their algorithm needs a number of cutting planes for FR and is assumed to be known.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation