2018 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/globalsip.2018.8646479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Ensemble of Locally Optimum Detectors for Detection of Adversarial Examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our future research will investigate detector-aware UAP attacks. Randomization strategies such as proposed in our prior work [16] could provide an effective approach in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our future research will investigate detector-aware UAP attacks. Randomization strategies such as proposed in our prior work [16] could provide an effective approach in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proposed a LO-GLRT for the detection of adversarial inputs in [15]. Subsequent extensions of the approach include locally optimal tests for random ensembles of image patches [16], and detection of targeted-UAPs [17]. We empirically showed the two-stage-trained LO-GLRT to be competitive in statistical performance to the PRN detector for CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets, and significantly better for the ImageNet dataset [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other detectors, LO detectors are naturally suited to detection of UAPs that have small norm. LO detectors for adversarial perturbations detection were first described in [9], [10], for the setting of detecting finitely many perturbations of the input that are known to the detector. Here, we derive a locally optimal generalized likelihood ratio test (LO-GLRT) for detecting random targeted UAPs in an input of a classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current strategies to defend a classifier against adversarial perturbations fall into two categories: (1) adapting the training algorithms to learn models which are more robust, using for example adversarial training [6][7][8], (2) detect and possibly rectify the adversarially perturbed inputs [9][10][11]. While adversarial training has shown improvement of the DNN against both input dependent and input independent perturbation in images, the improved robustness often come at expense of accuracy on unperturbed inputs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LO detectors are more interpretable than other detection methods for small-norm UAPs. LO detectors were earlier described in [9,10], for the setting of detecting finitely many perturbations of the input that are known to the detector. Here, we derive a locally optimal generalized likelihood ratio test (LO-GLRT) for detecting random targeted UAPs in an input of a classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%