2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2847112
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Forest and LightGBM-Based Human Health Check for Medical Device Fault Detection

Abstract: Medical devices are items used directly or indirectly in the human body and are a prerequisite for hospital treatment of patients, and their quality can have a direct impact on the health of patients, so strengthening the quality control of medical device use is a hot spot of concern in the clinic. Current medical device testing can reduce the occurrence of adverse events, but it cannot be completely avoided, and its work still needs to be further strengthened. In this paper, we design a two-way feature select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three broad categories include quantitative and qualitative model-based methods and retrospective history-based methods . Fault detection has been applied to healthcare, , with many machine learning and deep learning approaches seeing success. However, model-based or rule-based approaches are primarily used for CGM fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three broad categories include quantitative and qualitative model-based methods and retrospective history-based methods . Fault detection has been applied to healthcare, , with many machine learning and deep learning approaches seeing success. However, model-based or rule-based approaches are primarily used for CGM fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%