2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random forest wetland classification using ALOS-2 L-band, RADARSAT-2 C-band, and TerraSAR-X imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
159
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
159
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Novack et al [54] showed that RF classifier can evaluate each attribute internally; thus, it is less sensitive to the increase of variables (Tables 5 and 6). The object-based classifier can provide faster and better results and can be easily applied to classify forest types [24,39,40,55]. In addition, this classification method has the ability to handle predictor variables with a multimodal distribution well due to the high variability in time and space [50,56]; especially, no sophisticated parameter tuning is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Novack et al [54] showed that RF classifier can evaluate each attribute internally; thus, it is less sensitive to the increase of variables (Tables 5 and 6). The object-based classifier can provide faster and better results and can be easily applied to classify forest types [24,39,40,55]. In addition, this classification method has the ability to handle predictor variables with a multimodal distribution well due to the high variability in time and space [50,56]; especially, no sophisticated parameter tuning is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each decision tree gives a classification result for the samples not chosen as training samples. The decision tree "votes" for that class, and the final class is determined by the largest number of votes [24]. This approach can handle thousands of input variables without variable deletion and is not susceptible to over-fitting as the anti-noising ability is enhanced by randomization.…”
Section: Object-based Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they are of great use when the efficiency of optical sensors is hampered by cloud cover and day/night conditions. Furthermore, SAR signal penetration depth through vegetation and soil offers additional information unavailable from optical remote sensing data [44,45]. This is of great importance for monitoring the flooding status of vegetation due to enhanced double bounce scattering effects.…”
Section: Wetland Classification Using Sar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, several studies reported the superior capability of L-band relative to the shorter wavelengths (e.g., C-and X-band) for monitoring woody wetlands (e.g., swamp), since the incident SAR signal interacts with larger trunk and branch components [48,49]. In particular, L-band holds great promise in discriminating between forested wetland (e.g., swamp) and dry forest [45,50]. However, shorter wavelengths are preferred for monitoring herbaceous vegetation because SAR wavelength and vegetation canopies (e.g., leaf) are relatively the same size [51].…”
Section: Sar Wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a lot of studies, RF classifier performed equally well to SVMs in terms of classification accuracy and training time [57][58][59], but RF was acknowledged more user-friendly for the number of user-defined parameters required by RF classifiers is less than the number required for SVMs and easier to define [60]. The RF algorithm has not only been applied successfully in pixel-based image analyses, but has also shown great promise in the OBIA method for its high accuracy [61] and robustness to training sample reduction and feature selection [62,63]. Therefore, the RF algorithm was adopted in the current work.…”
Section: Recognizing Changed Objects Using the Rf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%