1996
DOI: 10.1090/dimacs/026/18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random generation of test instances with controlled attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that when the number of variables becomes large, the technique using EUP is advantageous. Table 1 shows the number of states and time required in solving AIM benchmark problems [2] by the algorithm using EUP. These problems are the DIMACS Challenge benchmark problems.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shows that when the number of variables becomes large, the technique using EUP is advantageous. Table 1 shows the number of states and time required in solving AIM benchmark problems [2] by the algorithm using EUP. These problems are the DIMACS Challenge benchmark problems.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable and its negation are called literal. The logical sum of literal [e.g., (x 1 + x 2 __ + x 3 )] is called a clause. For a set of clauses C 1 , C 2 , .…”
Section: Satisfiability Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have used the package SAT4J [34] which contains a java implementation of an exact method based DPLL. In order to assess the efficiency and accuracy of our approach, we have performed several tests taken from the AIM benchmark instances [35]. The AIM instances are all generated with a particular Random-3-SAT instance generator.…”
Section: Implementation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, from FACT instances, it is easy to generate SAT instances with a unique solution; thus, by negating the unique solution, we can easily generate "negative" SAT instances. (In general, "negative" instance generation is difficult [AIM96].) Secondly, with efficient reductions, we can analyze the concrete hardness of SAT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%