2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0143385704000033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random iteration of analytic maps

Abstract: We consider analytic maps f j : D → D of a domain D into itself and ask when does the sequence f 1 •· · ·•f n converge locally uniformly on D to a constant. In the case of one complex variable, we are able to show that this is so if there is a sequence {w 1 , w 2 , . . . } in D whose values are not taken by any f j in D, and which is homogeneous in the sense that it comes within a fixed hyperbolic distance of any point of D. The situation for several complex variables is also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2] Beardon, Carne, Minda and Ng proved the following result: In [5] Keen and Lakic showed that also the converse of (2) holds:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [2] Beardon, Carne, Minda and Ng proved the following result: In [5] Keen and Lakic showed that also the converse of (2) holds:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given a holomorphic iterated function system, one is interested in knowing its asymptotical behavior, namely, to know the possible limits (in the compact-open topology for instance) of the sequence. In general such a question is rather difficult and one contents to know which conditions guarantee that every limit of {F j } is constant (we refer the reader to the papers [2] and [5] and bibliography therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While each finite algorithmic step can readily be pictured, not so for the iteration limit! And from the outset it may not even be clear whether or not a particular X is the attractor of an iterated function system (IFS); see, e.g., [3,4,10,15,24]. Moreover, far from all fractals fall in the affine IFS class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of iterated function systems (see [3]) introduced new degenerate subdomains that are not relatively compact in ∆. It also considered more general iterated function systems formed from maps in Hol(Ω, X) where X ⊂ Ω are arbitrary plane domains such that Ω (and hence also X) admits ∆ as a universal cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent articles are concerned with the study of iterated function systems and its applications, see for example, [3], [13], [14], [15]. We would like to thank Fred Gardiner for numerous helpful discussions and remarks on an earlier version of this paper and Jonathan Brezin for his editorial advice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%