2012
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/44/444006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random-matrix theory of amplifying and absorbing resonators with $\mathcal {PT}$ or $\mathcal {PTT}^{\prime }$ symmetry

Abstract: We formulate gaussian and circular random-matrix models representing a coupled system consisting of an absorbing and an amplifying resonator, which are mutually related by a generalized time-reversal symmetry. Motivated by optical realizations of such systems we consider a PT or a PT T ′ time-reversal symmetry, which impose different constraints on magneto-optical effects, and then focus on five common settings. For each of these, we determine the eigenvalue distribution in the complex plane in the short-wavel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longhi (2010) discovered that a PT -symmetric cavity that acts as a laser must behave simultaneously as a coherent perfect absorber; see also . A random-matrix theory for PT -symmetric cavities has been developed by Birchall and Schomerus (2012). An experimental realization of a PT -symmetric cavity in the microwave and in the optical regime has been reported by (Bittner et al, 2012c) and (Chang et al, 2014;Peng et al, 2014), respectively.…”
Section: B Exceptional Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longhi (2010) discovered that a PT -symmetric cavity that acts as a laser must behave simultaneously as a coherent perfect absorber; see also . A random-matrix theory for PT -symmetric cavities has been developed by Birchall and Schomerus (2012). An experimental realization of a PT -symmetric cavity in the microwave and in the optical regime has been reported by (Bittner et al, 2012c) and (Chang et al, 2014;Peng et al, 2014), respectively.…”
Section: B Exceptional Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we restrict the discussion to purely non-unitary evolution L H = 0, leaving the effect of the Hamiltonian for future studies and thus henceforth we use L = L D . An alternative approach has been considered by studying ergodic many-body Hamiltonians perturbed by a nonhermitian term [26][27][28][29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition can then be investigated by combining the effective models set up in the previous section with random-matrix theory [20,23,40], thus, ensembles of Hamiltonians H (usually composed with random Gaussian matrix elements) or timeevolution operators F (distributed according to a Haar measure) which are only constrained by the symmetries of the problem. Closer inspection identifies two natural scenarios [26,28], described in the following two subsections, and a semiclassical source of corrections to random-matrix theory, discussed thereafter [27]. The interplay of the various time and energy scales is illustrated in figure 5.…”
Section: Mesoscopic Energy and Times Scalesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Keeping µ/E T in this limit fixed and finite, the real phase is thus completely destroyed, and the focus turns to the typical decay and growth rates encoded in the imaginary parts Im ω n of the complex eigenvalues. Numerical sampling of the random-matrix ensembles suggests that the distribution P (Im ω n /µ; µ/E T ) attains a stationary limit for M ≫ 1 [26][27][28]. At µ E T , one then finds a finite fraction of strongly amplified states N, N T ≫ 1), where M = /τ ∆ is the number of internal modes mixed by multiple scattering with scattering time τ and N is the number of channels coupling the resonators, with transparency T .…”
Section: Growth and Decay Rates In The Semiclassical Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%