Random movement of predators can eliminate trophic cascades in marine protected areas

Abstract

Abstract. The protection of predators inside marine reserves is expected to generate trophic cascades with predator density increasing but prey density decreasing; however, predators and prey often both increase inside reserves. This mismatch between the expected and observed change in prey density has been explained because prey also are harvested; that is, the protection of prey compensates for the additional predation inside the reserve. Here, we show that this mechanism alone cannot increase densities of predator and prey; other mechanisms are required, and we hypothesized that movement of predator and/or prey might provide such a mechanism. We therefore built two spatially implicit two-patch predator-prey models with movement of predator and prey between reserve and fishing grounds. We show that post-settlement movement of predators (but not prey) altered the strength of trophic cascades and could increase densities of both predator and focal prey. We further built a more general model that shows that predator post-settlement movement can reinforce and even supplement the effect of two previously investigated mechanisms producing trophic cascades: a prey size refuge and predator density-dependent mortality. Our study increases understanding of mechanisms that can alter the strength (and direction) of prey responses inside marine reserves and highlights the importance of movement in human-induced heterogeneous systems.

How public reaction to disease information across scales and the impacts of vector control methods influence disease prevalence and control efficacy

“…This is because under small mosquito breeding capacity, mosquito larvae would have stronger density-dependent mortality (see Eq. 5); thus, killing more adults (i.e., less air-based concern) can release more space for mosquito larvae, which boosts mosquito growth (i.e., the compensation from density-dependent mortality; see (41-45). With this compensated mosquito growth, average infections also increase (see the higher values at lower adult concern in Fig.…”

The Effects of Invasive Epibionts on Crab–mussel Communities: A Theoretical Approach to Understand Mussel Population Decline

“…That is, under high epibiont cover of adult mussels, would a crab prefer to cannibalise its own conspecifics [46,47], rather than switching to juvenile mussels? Another interesting future direction is to look at the foraging of crabs as they move in and out of patches containing mussels, some of which might be protected by mussel farmers, akin to marine protected areas [9,10]. A spatially explicit approach to this end, modeling a changing habitat based on mussel density, would also be interesting [14].…”

Mobility and its sensitivity to fitness differences determine consumer–resource distributions

“…Movement can influence species interactions and distributions across heterogeneous landscapes [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Previous studies of fitness-directed movement used a modelling framework similar to ours (i.e.…”