2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511619632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Networks for Communication

Abstract: When is a random network (almost) connected? How much information can it carry? How can you find a particular destination within the network? And how do you approach these questions - and others - when the network is random? The analysis of communication networks requires a fascinating synthesis of random graph theory, stochastic geometry and percolation theory to provide models for both structure and information flow. This book is the first comprehensive introduction for graduate students and scientists to te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(8) in Mao and Anderson [21] which was derived for the specific case of a square domain. Following numerous studies by probabilists and engineers [1,2], these authors however assumed an exponential scaling of system size V with ρ which essentially renders boundary effects negligible. Scaling the system in such a way is a common approach as it corresponds to the limit of infinite density at fixed connection probability, however in practice this limit is approached only for unphysically large volumes.…”
Section: Full Connection Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(8) in Mao and Anderson [21] which was derived for the specific case of a square domain. Following numerous studies by probabilists and engineers [1,2], these authors however assumed an exponential scaling of system size V with ρ which essentially renders boundary effects negligible. Scaling the system in such a way is a common approach as it corresponds to the limit of infinite density at fixed connection probability, however in practice this limit is approached only for unphysically large volumes.…”
Section: Full Connection Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random geometric network models [1,2] comprise a collection of entities called nodes embedded in region of typically two or three dimensions, together with connecting links between pairs of nodes that exist with a probability related to the node locations. They appear in numerous complex systems including in nanoscience [3], epidemiology [4,5], forest fires [6], social networks [7,8], and wireless communications [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the points in P μ/2,24,25 that are path-connected to V and to T respectively). Let b 1 = b(y, z) and 5) and for any b ∈ D 1 and a ∈ K 1 we have max(|b − y|, |a − z|) ≤ 0.9991. Next take further discs D i = C 0.0001 (b i ) and K i = C 0.0001 (a i ), for 2 ≤ i ≤ 7, such that each of these discs is contained in A 20,24 , and discs D 1 , K 1 , .…”
Section: μP(· U Y )P(· V )[1 − P(· T ∪ U Z )]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak inequality p site c ≥ p bond c is well-known; see for example Chap. 2 of [5]. If G is a rooted tree, then it is easy to see that p site c = p bond c , as each vertex, other than the root, can be uniquely identified by an edge and vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random geometric network is now-a-day getting immense popularity in society and nature for the complex system's modelling. Random geometric network models [5,6] consist of a collection of entities called nodes embedded in a region of exclusively two or three dimensions, together with connecting links between pairs of nodes that exist with a probability related to the node locations. These models perform well in demonstrating numerous complex systems including Nano science [7], epidemiology [8,9], forest fires [10], social networks [11,12], and wireless communications [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%