2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.14.512301
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random noise promotes slow heterogeneous synaptic dynamics important for robust working memory computation

Abstract: Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) based on model neurons that communicate via continuous signals have been widely used to study how cortical neurons perform cognitive tasks. Training such networks to perform tasks that require information maintenance over a brief period (i.e., working memory tasks) remains a challenge. Critically, the training process becomes difficult when the synaptic decay time constant is not fixed to a large constant number for all the model neurons. We hypothesize that the brain utilizes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning rate was set to 0.01, and the TensorFlow default values were used for the rest of the parameters including the first and second moment decay rates. To further impose biological constraints, we enforced Dale’s law (uniform neurotransmitter release characteristics within separate excitatory and inhibitory neurons) using methods similar to those implemented in previous studies ([43, 49, 74]). To adhere to empirical findings regarding the ratio of excitatory and inhibitory neurons observed in the brain, each RNN consists of 80% excitatory and 20% inhibitory units (i.e., E-I ratio of 80/20; [30, 75, 76]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning rate was set to 0.01, and the TensorFlow default values were used for the rest of the parameters including the first and second moment decay rates. To further impose biological constraints, we enforced Dale’s law (uniform neurotransmitter release characteristics within separate excitatory and inhibitory neurons) using methods similar to those implemented in previous studies ([43, 49, 74]). To adhere to empirical findings regarding the ratio of excitatory and inhibitory neurons observed in the brain, each RNN consists of 80% excitatory and 20% inhibitory units (i.e., E-I ratio of 80/20; [30, 75, 76]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%