2007
DOI: 10.1002/nag.652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random porosity fields and their influence on the stability of granular media

Abstract: SUMMARYIt is well established that the mechanical behavior of granular media is strongly influenced by the media's microstructure. In this work, the influence of the microstructure is studied by integrating advances in the areas of geostatistics and computational plasticity, by spatially varying the porosity on samples of sand. In particular, geostatistical tools are used to characterize and simulate random porosity fields that are then fed into a nonlinear finite element model. The underlying effective mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computersimulated 3D images of regular packings of spherical and non-spherical particles [54] suggest that the void ratio distribution follows a Gaussian (normal) distribution. It is noted that other authors [55][56][57] advocate a truncated exponential distribution, but at this juncture, it is not clear how faithfully each type of distribution reproduces the void ratio distribution of actual granular materials. We herein use a Gaussian distribution in which the void ratio is made to spread about a mean value of 0.70 with a standard deviation of 0.025, which corresponds to a hypothetical medium sand as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Boundary Value Simulationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Computersimulated 3D images of regular packings of spherical and non-spherical particles [54] suggest that the void ratio distribution follows a Gaussian (normal) distribution. It is noted that other authors [55][56][57] advocate a truncated exponential distribution, but at this juncture, it is not clear how faithfully each type of distribution reproduces the void ratio distribution of actual granular materials. We herein use a Gaussian distribution in which the void ratio is made to spread about a mean value of 0.70 with a standard deviation of 0.025, which corresponds to a hypothetical medium sand as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Boundary Value Simulationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…6b. Planes of maximum weakness corresponding to an angle of principle anisotropy of ≈ 30 • from the vertical (loading) direction have been noted elsewhere in granular media and sedimentary rock (Goodman 1989;Andrade et al 2008).…”
Section: Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Diffuse mode bifurcation, 3,64 pointwise local material bifurcation, 39,53,65 and their competing mechanism in failure in geomaterials 66 are still on-going research subjects. In previous works, 30,32,[67][68][69] occurrence of material bifurcations during transitional courses of deformations was investigated. In these studies, spatially varying material property § § In these figures and hereafter, we use the logarithmic axial compressive strain a ∶= −log(H∕H 0 ) (compression positive) and the logarithmic volumetric strain v ∶= log(V∕V 0 ) (expansion positive), where H and V denote, respectively, the current height and volume of the specimen after deformation, and H 0 and V 0 the initial ones before deformation.…”
Section: Detecting Bifurcation Point and Branch Switching Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%