2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5131028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random positive operator valued measures

Abstract: We introduce several notions of random positive operator valued measures (POVMs), and we prove that some of them are equivalent. We then study statistical properties of the effect operators for the canonical examples, starting from the limiting eigenvalue distribution. We derive the large system limit for several quantities of interest in quantum information theory, such as the sharpness, the noise content, and the probability range. Finally, we study different compatibility criteria, and we compare them for g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate this, we choose a rather extreme example of a random 4-qubit target state with the following measurement scheme: perform as many measurements and repetitions as prescribed by DFE for achieving a risk of 0.05 at a confidence level of 95%, but instead of performing Pauli measurements, we choose random POVMs, generated as per Ref. [32]. In this case, we obtain a risk of ≈ 0.023 from the minimax method, which is larger than the risk for Pauli measurements using the minimax method (see Tab.…”
Section: A Direct Fidelity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate this, we choose a rather extreme example of a random 4-qubit target state with the following measurement scheme: perform as many measurements and repetitions as prescribed by DFE for achieving a risk of 0.05 at a confidence level of 95%, but instead of performing Pauli measurements, we choose random POVMs, generated as per Ref. [32]. In this case, we obtain a risk of ≈ 0.023 from the minimax method, which is larger than the risk for Pauli measurements using the minimax method (see Tab.…”
Section: A Direct Fidelity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sample N = 10 6 pairs of random POVMs in a manner explained at the beginning of this section. For further details on sampling, we refer the reader to [27,28].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is Hermitian whenever both A and B are Hermitian. The Jordan product can be used to study the compatibility of measurements (see [23,24]). In particular, for POVMs {M 1 , .…”
Section: Jordan Products Of Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%