1988
DOI: 10.1016/0950-5849(88)90037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random testing revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of novel strategies termed Adaptive Random Testing (ART) have been demonstrated to significantly increase the effectiveness of random testing [Chen et al 2007a[Chen et al , 2007b[Chen et al , 2003[Chen et al , 2004a[Chen et al , 2004b[Chen et al , 2001. Benefits of random testing [Agrawal 1978;Duran and Ntafos 1984;Loo and Tsai 1988;Ntafos 1998;Schneck 1979], and by extension ART, include the low cost associated with the random generation of test cases, and the ease of automation associated with the technique. ART methods are centered on the assumption that failure-triggering inputs occur within clusters in the input domain [Chan et al 1996;Ammann and Knight 1988;Finelli 1991;Chan et al 2004].…”
Section: Adaptive Random Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of novel strategies termed Adaptive Random Testing (ART) have been demonstrated to significantly increase the effectiveness of random testing [Chen et al 2007a[Chen et al , 2007b[Chen et al , 2003[Chen et al , 2004a[Chen et al , 2004b[Chen et al , 2001. Benefits of random testing [Agrawal 1978;Duran and Ntafos 1984;Loo and Tsai 1988;Ntafos 1998;Schneck 1979], and by extension ART, include the low cost associated with the random generation of test cases, and the ease of automation associated with the technique. ART methods are centered on the assumption that failure-triggering inputs occur within clusters in the input domain [Chan et al 1996;Ammann and Knight 1988;Finelli 1991;Chan et al 2004].…”
Section: Adaptive Random Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lots of research has been conducted in this field and diverse methods to improve failure detection capability of test cases have been proposed ( [2,3,4,5,6]). A standard approach for automatic selection of test cases is random testing [7,8]. The intuition behind random testing is to select test cases randomly until a stopping condition such as detecting a failure, executing predefined number of test cases or ending of a time limitation is met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Software Testing, there has been much debate over the use of Random Testing (RT) as an effective method [6], [7], [12], [14]. When testing software, a test case is a combination of inputs to the software which represent a single use of the software; Random Testing refers to the selection of test cases at random from the input domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When testing software, a test case is a combination of inputs to the software which represent a single use of the software; Random Testing refers to the selection of test cases at random from the input domain. There are many reasons why Random Testing remains a popular choice: in addition to its simplicity, and the efficiency of test case generation [7], reliability estimates and statistical analyses are also easily performed. In fact, many real-life applications do make use of Random Testing [10], [11], [13], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%