2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random vs. alternating donor-acceptor copolymers: A comparative study of absorption and field effect mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional groups for polymerization were chosen to be bromines, not only in order to keep the synthesis route as short as possible but also mostly as it can be employed in many different polymerization techniques that are commonly used to synthesize state-of-the-art low-bandgap polymers, such as Stille, Suzuki, Yamamoto, Negishi, Kumada, and Heck cross-coupling polymerizations. It has also been shown earlier that no strictly alternating donor–acceptor sequence is required for lowering the optical gap and random or statistical copolymerization is a viable option. , When the azide-functionalized comonomer 5 is added in small quantities (less than 5 wt %) to AA/BB-type polycondensations, a cross-linkable tercopolymer can be obtained that exhibits repeating units y which are identical to the regular strictly alternating copolymer and a repeating unit x consisting of the azido-functionalized thiophene 5 and the comonomer carrying the complementary functional groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional groups for polymerization were chosen to be bromines, not only in order to keep the synthesis route as short as possible but also mostly as it can be employed in many different polymerization techniques that are commonly used to synthesize state-of-the-art low-bandgap polymers, such as Stille, Suzuki, Yamamoto, Negishi, Kumada, and Heck cross-coupling polymerizations. It has also been shown earlier that no strictly alternating donor–acceptor sequence is required for lowering the optical gap and random or statistical copolymerization is a viable option. , When the azide-functionalized comonomer 5 is added in small quantities (less than 5 wt %) to AA/BB-type polycondensations, a cross-linkable tercopolymer can be obtained that exhibits repeating units y which are identical to the regular strictly alternating copolymer and a repeating unit x consisting of the azido-functionalized thiophene 5 and the comonomer carrying the complementary functional groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic photovoltaics (OPV) offer a promise of low-cost, large area, and flexible electronic devices through the use of conjugated polymer active layers. , The backbones of conjugated polymers have been extensively investigated, yielding a broad range of linkage patterns, including homopolymers, random, alternating, and block copolymers. , Explicit design choices within these major architectures, such as identity of donor/acceptor monomers , and side-chain engineering, allow for precise tuning of desirable properties such as absorption breadth, frontier orbital levels, solubility, and polymer self-organization. Of the previously mentioned backbone architectures, a perfectly alternating donor–acceptor polymer structure is broadly popular for achieving low band gaps and improved efficiencies in solar cells. ,, However, many of these systems exhibit red-shifted absorption, sacrificing short-wavelength photons. , More recently, a new class of semi-random polymers have successfully incorporated multiple, distinct, and randomized chromophores that exhibit broadened absorption profiles. Semi-random polymers based on regioregular poly­(3-hexyl­thiophene) (rr-P3HT) have additional unique design advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic photovoltaics (OPV) offer a promise of low-cost, large area, and flexible electronic devices through the use of conjugated polymer active layers. 1,2 The backbones of conjugated polymers have been extensively investigated, yielding a broad range of linkage patterns, including homopolymers, random, 3−7 alternating, 8 and block copolymers. 9,10 Explicit design choices within these major architectures, such as identity of donor/acceptor monomers 11,12 and side-chain engineering, 13 allow for precise tuning of desirable properties such as absorption breadth, frontier orbital levels, solubility, and polymer self-organization.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the polymers exhibit typically dual band absorption: the higher-energy bands are attributed to π−π* transition, while the low-energy bands correspond to intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) arising from the interactions between donor and acceptor moieties. 38 In chloroform solution, PD-CST owns the low-energy absorption band in a range of ca. 500−800 nm, whereas PD-3F-CST, PD-23F-CST, and PD-25F-CST show similar absorption behavior with the low-energy absorption band in a range of ca.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra of the CST -based polymers were recorded both in dilute CHCl 3 solution and as thin films spin-coated on quartz glass (Figure ). All the polymers exhibit typically dual band absorption: the higher-energy bands are attributed to π–π* transition, while the low-energy bands correspond to intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) arising from the interactions between donor and acceptor moieties . In chloroform solution, PD-CST owns the low-energy absorption band in a range of ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%