Parrondo games with one-dimensional spatial dependence were introduced by Toral and extended to the two-dimensional setting by Mihailović and Rajković. M N players are arranged in an M × N array. There are three games, the fair, spatially independent game A, the spatially dependent game B, and game C, which is a random mixture or nonrandom pattern of games A and B. Of interest is µB (or µC ), the mean profit per turn at equilibrium to the set of M N players playing game B (or game C). Game A is fair, so if µB ≤ 0 and µC > 0, then we say the Parrondo effect is present.We obtain a strong law of large numbers and a central limit theorem for the sequence of profits of the set of M N players playing game B (or game C). The mean and variance parameters are computable for small arrays and can be simulated otherwise. The SLLN justifies the use of simulation to estimate the mean. The CLT permits evaluation of the standard error of a simulated estimate. We investigate the presence of the Parrondo effect for both small arrays and large ones. One of the findings of Mihailović and Rajković was that "capital evolution depends to a large degree on the lattice size." We provide evidence that this conclusion is incorrect. Part of the evidence is that, under certain conditions, the means µB and µC converge as M, N → ∞. Proof requires that a related spin system on Z 2 be ergodic. However, our sufficient conditions for ergodicity are rather restrictive.Parrondo games with one-dimensional spatial dependence were introduced by Toral [1] and extended to the two-dimensional setting by Mihailović and Rajković [2]. The basic game depends on two integer parameters, M ≥ 3 and N ≥ 3, and five probability parameters, p 0 , p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , p 4 ∈ [0, 1]. There are *